Proposed North American Union Flag

July 25, 2007 | processing please hold

[processing please hold]

Observe.

[justa-hairyape]

Hey, we may need those old confederates to help fight the NAU. This time they will be fighting FOR the United States against the NAU Depressed Wage Slaver Barons.

All kidding aside, does anyone know where they plan to build the new NAU capital ?

[wtc911]

I just found that site earlier today. Do you know anything about who it is that is working on it? their backgrounds, political affiliations, and such?

________________________________________________

No but I'll dig around. I'm sure I'll find folks on the left but this issue is sure enough making strange bedfellows, eh.

[Paige]

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf

[processing please hold]

Needless to say she was, not so gently, escorted out.

Really??????

[nicmarlo]

Nice try, rudeboy. I did more than dump documents. In the one post that you call spam I WROTE IN NARRATIVE FORM my thoughts, connecting ideas together and explaining how one can retrieve different documents to READ FOR THEMSELVES, so that one could form their own opinions, either aligning with mine....or not. Surely, you don't need to be spoon fed every paragraph from every document? Surely, you can read, or you couldn't type your empty, baseless opinions. After the one post I made, which you called spam, which I call an informative post, with documents backing up my thoughts and claims, I posted legislation, already passed or proposed. After that post, I wrote in LENGTHY NARRATIVE FORM, explaining how many of the bills, already passed or proposed, are connected, part and parcel, with the tentacle arms necessary for creation and preparation for an NAU. Upon what do YOU rely to refute my opinions, which come from reading each and every document I posted? Upon what do YOU rely to refute the many documents I posted, some of which are 100's of pages in length and are indicative of plans for the formation of the NAU? Upon what do YOU rely to claim that the dots I connected, and have many others, including the respected and renowned conservative, Phylis Schlafly, are "wrong, baseless and in error"?

BTW, it is not upon me to write summaries of each document, which, in the end, would be meaningless, as you would only claim they are "just another biased kooky" opinion....but which are the very same conclusions reached by the one you love to disparage (J. Corsi), the same conclusions made by one you will likely now begin disparaging, P. Schlafly, and the same conclusions, as well, by Lou Dobbs, to name just three.

These very people have been "spoon feeding" you, line by line. Like I'm going to do the same thing for you, all over again? Not a snowball's chance in h*ll.

[nicmarlo]

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.... : )

[nicmarlo]

They’re so transparent and open that they kept citizens away by 25 miles from its latest SECRET meetings in Canada.

[processing please hold]

Thanks for posted that. I already have it, I hope scoffers have the sense to click on your link and read it.

[Paige]

Here’s some books that may help...

These are the two men you want to do background research on .. David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski

Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management, Holly Sklar , South Bend Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980

The Planned Destruction of America James Wardner

Rule by Secrecy : The Hidden History that connects the trilateral Commission, the freemasons, and the great pyramids

“Trilaterals over Washington,” Antony C. Sutton Patrick M. Wood

American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission Series: Cambridge Studies in International Relations (No. 5) Stephen Gill York University, Ontario

Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy by Laurence H. Shoup on 7 pages

U. S. Capitalism in Crisis by Union of Radical Political Economists Staff

The Fiscal Crisis of the State by James R. O’Connor

http://afgen.com/trilateral.html

Also read what Goldwater had to say about these people...

Another site:
Toward a North American Union
By Patrick Wood on August 25, 2006 http://www.augustreview.com/index.php?module=pagesetter&func=printpub&tid=4&pid=14

[nicmarlo]

I prefer to call them by their real names: tricky devils, the lot of them.

[Borax Queen]

Yorkie - the graphic, LOL!

[FreedomPoster]

CWII Ping.

[nicmarlo]

: )

[processing please hold]

They’re so transparent and open that they kept citizens away by 25 miles from its latest SECRET meetings in Canada.

You caught the irony in that too, huh?

[Borax Queen]

Oh, just great... bump for later reading. Thanks!

[KevinDavis]

Beware of the Stonecutters!!!!!

[nicmarlo]

When they open their mouths, get ready for the next lie.

[wtc911]

The Canadian site was founded by Susan Thompson, a second tier journalist. Although all the indications are that they want nothing more than to keep Canada from being annexed by the USA and for the 'elites' of Canada to be exposed, if you dig you find that Ms. Thompson has written numerous articles for Move-on.org. (quelle suprise!).

Marxist? Maybe. Anti-USA? Maybe. On the right side of this one? Definitely.

[processing please hold]

I prefer to call them by their real names

I know what names I'd like to call them but the management would ban me for using such language.

[nicmarlo]

On the right side of this one? Definitely.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.....