Debuted today at Oshkosh (and on aviation websites).
To: taildragger
To: taildragger
I hope that thing glides well because I would hate to have an engine failure on a single engine aircraft.
5 posted on
07/23/2007 10:33:02 AM PDT by
randomhero97
("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
To: taildragger
Great looking little plane. What does one cost?
To: taildragger
I saw a mock-up of this plane's cabin once. I'm a broad shouldered man and it was very cramped for me. The glass cockpit looked good, though. Would love to have one.
-ccm
10 posted on
07/23/2007 10:38:59 AM PDT by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: taildragger
A single engine VLJ makes perfect sense. I think the failure rate among piston engine singles is higher than the failure rate among business jets.
Honda announced that they will build the HF120, so there will be a nice turbofan engine to power VLJs.
(The keyword "aerospace" has been added to this post.)
12 posted on
07/23/2007 10:41:51 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: taildragger
To: taildragger
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
