Posted on 07/15/2007 12:11:18 PM PDT by processing please hold
Activists already are preparing to protest the third summit meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, a trilateral initiative between the U.S., Canada and Mexico seen by critics as a major step toward a North American Union, according to WND columnist Jerome Corsi, author of a new book on the subject, "The Late Great USA."
The meeting, which has received almost no mention in the U.S. mainstream media, is scheduled for Aug. 20 and 21 in Montebello, Quebec, at the Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello resort.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is scheduled to host the Quebec summit, which will be attended by Mexican President Felipe Calderon and President Bush.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
And if you think anybody believes your arguments are “persuasive” or “cohesive” as to your continued claims that this matter is insignificant to you, or that you don’t believe efforts to implement an NAU exist, though you are CONSTANTLY found on these threads, you and toddster are the only morons in the room (just ask him...he “believes” you).
lol!
I never said that the RFID technology was in those documents.
In fact, I’m not the one who mentioned “RFID technology”. However, I am aware that tracking in clothes has been implemented.
Sadly I agree.
When it comes to our political system, I believe the fix is in. We citizens are nothing to them but a check book to further their agendas. Lord, save us from our politicians.
They're watching you, right now. Do you really think those shoes go with your pants? LOL!
And the funny thing is, I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt if you would only take advantage of it. Wouldn't you derive some pleasure from getting me to admit that, "I never saw that before, I stand corrected?" Instead, you insist on the vacuous claim that I'm not reviewing your "evidence," when in fact I've reviewed it and found it wanting.
And quit with the BS about "finding" me on these threads. 1. I enjoy them, and 2. I reply to comments directed toward me. That's a far cry from being a paid "shill," however desperately you want me to actually be one. Think about it. If I was paid to quash any discussions of the NAU, why would I be bumping this thread over and over?
Bada boom!
*snicker*
Of course they are. Children are most susceptible to be influenced.....it's been done before and is, of course, currently being done in islamic countries to turn their children against non-muslims.
And that's where you lost her.
Pointing out I never said that would be like beating my head against the wall..............again. Keep on spinning, though.
Henry Lamb has written something - don’t ask me what it is because I heard it read on a radio program - that states all this stuff was set into place in the ‘70’s, and little by little, it is being implemented. We are nearing the final pieces being put into place.
It's a good article.
Let’s try this: I quoted a section of a SPP document regarding standarized apparel-care labels, and you replied that you know all about tracking devices in clothing. So you were either 1. implying that the SPP has something to do with tracking devices in clothing, or 2. changing the subject. Which was it?
That's hardly convincing. You cite no specifics. Waving brushes broadly persuades nobody to accept anything you have to say. Yet you pound away against multitudes of documents dismissing everything in its entirety....as if you have authority from above. What you have are empty opinions, back by.....just additional empty opinions. You provide nothing but empty opinions and think that by doing so it destroys the mounting EVIDENCE to the contrary.
toddster, you’ve been found wanting again. You’re dismissed; kindly pick up your marbles....and at least retreat.
For what reason did you post a section of the SPP which has to do with apparel-care labels?
Unless you believe that “apparel-care labels” is the focus of the SPP.
It’s a peripheral distraction you attempted to make, nothing more. Your distraction on that already received the attention it deserved: little.
Because you have provided none.
Let's try this: I have "specific" proof that the NAU is a sham concocted by Jerome Corsi in order to sell books. It can be found if you click on my moniker, and then select "Links." Now be careful, if you begin waving the broad brush, I'll accuse you of not reading the material I've provided. See how that works?
You're nothing but snake oil salesmen who wishes to make this about and discredit Corsi. If it's about any "person," it's about Pastor, who is designing this. I made a post which cites but ONE article by Corsi, numerous by Pastor, and DOZENS by others, including Governmental entities. Your deceitful tactics are transparently clear.
Because your argument, at the time, was revolving around the insidious nature of the SPP. Since you posted a link to the SPP as "evidence" of the same, I thought I'd use the link you provided to provide evidence that it is not.
That's the problem when someone gets lazy and doesn't try to prove their argument, instead simply throwing "spaghetti" at the wall and seeing what sticks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.