Posted on 07/15/2007 12:11:18 PM PDT by processing please hold
Activists already are preparing to protest the third summit meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, a trilateral initiative between the U.S., Canada and Mexico seen by critics as a major step toward a North American Union, according to WND columnist Jerome Corsi, author of a new book on the subject, "The Late Great USA."
The meeting, which has received almost no mention in the U.S. mainstream media, is scheduled for Aug. 20 and 21 in Montebello, Quebec, at the Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello resort.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is scheduled to host the Quebec summit, which will be attended by Mexican President Felipe Calderon and President Bush.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
Beats following my White Sox.
Pastor paying you in Shillings?
Perhaps if you’d follow the White Sox as religiously as you’re on these threads, you could help them out as much as you do the NAU.
I already knew you were a parrot, toddster....it was plainly obvious. The question is, how much is Pastor paying you to be a parrot?
The question is, how much is Pastor paying you to be a parrot?
I just realized something: when I finally do read Corsi’s latest, will I be more of a “moron” than the folks who ostensibly agree with him, yet didn’t bother to read it?
You’ve already run out of talking points?
Waiting for Pastor’s next script?
Hahahahahaha. So true, so true.
and sooooooo obvious!
I would, but there’s just one little problem.
That would require one to have intelligence.
He doesn’t nearly measure up to that ability level.
Speaking of “scripts,” what about comment #331?
If you say so honey.
The one which you won’t read the information?
If you had, you wouldn’t be asking “what about” it, because you’d stop denying the intention to implement an NAU by this government.
Unless, of course, you’re a paid shill. Methinks you are.
Speaking of “intelligence” and “ability level,” you’d better hope that making a cohesive argument isn’t a required ability.
That's funny!
I told you I read it, and couldn’t find anything about RFID technology. Are you telling me that you didn’t read my comment telling you I read it? LOL
The lady man doth protest too much, methinks.
That's because after we elect a President, even Reagan, who we think is someone who represents us and will proceed to carry out the things we want done, instead, we end up with members of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission still running the various agencies of the gov't because those are the people Reagan appoints, the same as Carter, Clinton, etc., did. They may be different people, but they are drawn from the same pool of people with the same agenda, and are the political appointees who get the positions (Under Secretary of State, etc.) that set the direction of the various agencies of the Executive Branch.
Many voters who voted for Reagan thought because he was not a member of either the CFR or TC, he would not make their members the heads of gov't agencies, but he did. It is my belief after seeing him appoint them, no person can be elected President unless he agrees prior to securing the nomination of either party that he will do the same. So we continue to travel in the same direction, down the same path, and the only difference in who we elect, for the most part, is how fast we are going to travel. The destination remains the same.
Damn girl, two great minds. See my post # 378. lololol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.