Replies

First let’s address two oxymorons : “delta momentum”(heisenberg)and “rest mass”(einstein). Delta means a rate of change of something, momentum means no change of state. Thus “delta momentum”(of the HUP)literally means “rate of change of no change of state” - an oxymoron. “rest” means momentum(mv), “mass” means change(mv^2/2). “rest mass” then taken literally means “momentum-mass” - direct opposites - an oxymoron.

In physics it is said : when all else fails, go back to NEWTON. His first law : an object will remain at rest or move at a constant velocity in a straight line(momentum state)until an external force is impressed upon it(mass change).

The mistake began with Simon De La Place(1827) : energy is momentum times velocity. Then parroted by Planck(1900) : the quantum area h is defined by q x p where q was his symbol for momentum and p for particle velocity. Then parroted by heisenberg(1927)in his HUP : h approx=to dM x dPv or h approx=to dM x dWs where dWs means incremental change in matter wavelength(complementary energy level).

Flat WRONG! The quantum area h is purely defined by Particle velocity(dPv) and Matter wavelength(dWs) : h = dPv x dWs. In other words, momentum and mass are subsidiary effects of either the BALANCE of Pv=Ws(momentum)or the IMBALANCE of Pv not=to Ws(mass). The formulas being not-t=PE=M=(W=P) and t=dKE=m=(P not=to W).

This then is quantum weirdness at its best. You think of momentum(M)as a ball rolling around in a cup, finally coming to a rest. Au Contrare! The ball is VERY delicately balanced on a needle tip, the slightest dPv or dWs change and it drops back into mass-time land again(lights, camera, ACTION).

This then is why “peace”, equilibrium, stasis is so hard to find in this world(gurus seek it, praying pilgrims seek it) : “rest” is an exceedingly hard to find BALANCE between the 2 great languages of complementarity(no rest for the wicked, right?).

So, go back to the 1920s and Einstein vs DeBroglie. Einstein was already a famous GERMAN physicist, DeBroglie was but a humble FRENCH physicist. And yet DeBroglie thought that if light was both particle and WAVE, why shouldn’t matter(we now call them fermions)be WAVES as well as particles? He published his matter wave theory in 1922.

In 1926 Davisson and Germer(at Bell labs) were shooting electrons at the normal angle at the face of a pure nickel crystal. Instead of bouncing off at random angles, they hit a peak at 50 deg, a completely unexpected result. This could ONLY be explained if the crystalline lattice of the Ni crystal was acting as a diffraction grating for the electron’s MATTER WAVES.

Wa-La : the other half of quantum mechanics was born, thus E=mc^2=hw where w is DeBroglie’s MATTER Wave number. Thus, as fermions we are half invisible MATTER WAVES; ie, the wavelength is given by h/mv. Since h is but 6.625 x 10^-34W the matter wavelengths are some 20 orders of magnitude shorter for CM objects than visual 4000A to 7700A wavelengths. You don’t SEE matter waves, you FEEL them as deceleration/weight in your sense of touch.

This then brought about the great AHA moment. If the electron is a negative charge and the proton a positive charge, and unlike charges attract; why doesn’t the electron just spiral down into the nucleus? AHA = it’s moving at c at the Bohr Radius, and the perimeter of its orbit is one matter wavelength. This then explains the stability of atoms.

Then the **** hit the fan : DeBroglie’s equation for the SPEED of a matter wave crest is U = c^2/v. That meant that matter waves travel FASTER than the speed of light. Einstein et al went ballistic as the c-limit was their sacred tenet. So they came up with the hokey phase/group cover story. You blink your eyelid in .1 sec : phase matter waves, carrying no information, rush in from beyond pluto’s orbit, cancelling everywhere except at the GROUP which wave-defines your moving eyelid....pure BS! But they used that cover story to consign DeBroglie to the crazy aunt alice category and the “wavefunction” is rarely spoken of by physicists(the relativistic fix was IN).

But what they failed to consider was : is c^2 in U=c^2/v an AREA(mass)or a LINE(momentum)? Both are valid ways to look at what that c^2 means.

Ok then, from careful astronomical observations, there isn’t an 8 minute c-retard in the sun’s gravitational influence on the earth, it seems to be instantaneous. Thus 149x10^6/9x10^10= 16.55 x 10^-4 sec. This then is why gravity waves have never been observed moving at the c-limit, it’s MATTER WAVES as Momentum lines that bose-bonds fermions in capacitance wells that is gravity!

This is also confirmed by the entanglement experiments, c^2 as momentum LINE is VERY fast. There is another clue : cooper pair electrons bound by matter waves in what is called the coherence length.

So, it’s been a century of Einstein and relativity but Louis DeBroglie win win out in the long run...and your BODY(neural network)is your “time-eye”....