Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: T Lady

Those pants are way too ugly for Sears OR Wal-Mart. Maybe she thinks Iowans all dress in “high-water” pants. What an insult to the people where she’s campaigning! For any man (OR woman) to dress so badly in public shows a distinct lack of respect for the people and the process. Or maybe she’s packed on a few pounds on the trail and her pants ride up? Ugh. Still, she looks terrible, and the posed “affection” reminds me of the stiff way that the Heinz-Kerry’s fiasco of an embrace appeared. Fake, fake, fake.


22 posted on 07/04/2007 4:19:48 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Enforcement, enforcement, enforcement. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: alwaysconservative
I distinctly remember those who wore ‘high waters’ or ‘floods’ were teased mercilessly during my junior and senior high school years back in the late Seventies. Although bell bottom pants were out by my Junior year (1979), no one was caught dead with straight legged pants an inch above the ankle. Very un chic and uncool.

...As for the Clintons 'posed' affection, you're spot on. Practically everything Democrats do is staged for one reason or another. It's no wonder the shallow Hollywood crowd relates to these people so well; everything they do is staged.

49 posted on 07/07/2007 10:02:29 PM PDT by T Lady (The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson