Finally, the truth is coming out. Who benefits? You bet it won’t be the American people.
...Interesting. The hard-core Republi-Crats won’t be able to live in denial much longer. Some of us have been saying this for the last five years or so, and being asked (not politely, I might add) to go over to DU.
Just read the SPP Myths and Facts page and you will see for yourself:
Myth: The SPP is a movement to merge the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union and establish a common currency.
It's a myth, people, a myth! We know because the government officials pushing the SPP have told us so!
Besides, the Council on Foreign Relations is just a think tank. They don't make concrete policy recommendations.
I've thought for some time that the globalists would try to bring about the NAU via incrementalism. Little bit by little bit, avoiding scrutiny when at all possible.
Bills authored in secret, minimal committee meetings.
And, before you know it, we are in the middle of some SPP spawned nightmare.
FLAME AWAY!!!
bump
Bush losing 'fast track' trade powers |
||
Posted by yahoo On 06/30/2007 10:53:32 AM CDT · 17 replies · 228+ views news.yahoo.com ^ Bush losing 'fast track' trade powersPresident Bush loses his power Saturday to seal "fast track" trade agreements without intervention from Congress, where Democrats blame recent deals for sending U.S. jobs abroad. Since 1975, only one other president, Bill Clinton, has been stripped of that trade promotion authority, designed to speed the reduction of trade barriers and open new markets with other countries. Bush won't get it back again, and the next president might not either. House Democratic leaders, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and Rep. Charles Rangel of New York, whose Ways and Means Committee handles trade policy, said... |
The same tactics work for other things like Gramscian democracy(Hitlery)... i.e. BIG government republican SHOULD BE an oxymoron.. it isn't...
In the 1960s that earned you screams of "Racist! Bigot!"
In fact, to this day any mention of "states rights" can trigger those Pavlovian responses. "States rights" are code words, you see.
"All power to government employees in Washington, D.C.!" Contempt and contumely for those who object. But times and technology have changed -- now we have free speech and the free press restored. Just ask the President and the Congress.
But...but...Linda Chavez and Lindsey Graham says this was all because we were racists!
I think that Robert A. Pastor has done most of the responding to criticism. The report makes clear that there is no connection to government and contains opinions of the authors.
It did state that our nations would not lose their sovereignty and it acknowledged Mexico's myriad problems.
It did emphasize merging customs and customs regulations to the extent of having a single North American border. There was a lot more to the document, of course.
Fine. But IMO first clean up the corrupt, criminal ruling class of Mexico and give Mexicans a chance at home -- it's the shame of North America (if not the World) that Mexico is a third-world cesspool of ruling class thugs and criminal corruption.
Meanwhile, the governments of all three countries have people working "to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing. . . ."
Personally I do not want a cesspool of government criminal corruption being part of a community with the United States of America.
Call me a nut, nativist, bigot, racist, xenophobe.. please!