Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/30/2007 1:33:13 PM PDT by hardback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: hardback

Finally, the truth is coming out. Who benefits? You bet it won’t be the American people.


2 posted on 06/30/2007 1:36:58 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback
It is truly amazing that people believe this nonsense!
4 posted on 06/30/2007 1:40:09 PM PDT by bybybill (HUNT RINOS IN THE PRIMARIES, SKIN RATS IN THE FALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback

...Interesting. The hard-core Republi-Crats won’t be able to live in denial much longer. Some of us have been saying this for the last five years or so, and being asked (not politely, I might add) to go over to DU.


5 posted on 06/30/2007 1:40:41 PM PDT by Ranger Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback; eyespysomething
Anyone who believes the fast track for SPP included (but almost not at all mentioned) in the immigration bill just defeated is a sign that our elected officials are attempting to impose a North American Community that would usurp our national sovereignty needs to put on their tinfoil hat.

Just read the SPP Myths and Facts page and you will see for yourself:

Myth: The SPP is a movement to merge the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union and establish a common currency.

It's a myth, people, a myth! We know because the government officials pushing the SPP have told us so!

Besides, the Council on Foreign Relations is just a think tank. They don't make concrete policy recommendations.

9 posted on 06/30/2007 1:52:04 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback
Now is not the time to let up. We need to pressure our politicians to enforce the existing immigration laws including deporting illegal aliens, building the fence and prosecuting businesses who do business with illegal aliens. The link below is a ping list to pay attention for other questionable legislation being considered in Congress.

Keeping Track Of The Congress Critters
10 posted on 06/30/2007 1:53:34 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback
FYI: I just added another two layers of protection to my tin foil hat and pulled on my flame proof pajamas.

I've thought for some time that the globalists would try to bring about the NAU via incrementalism. Little bit by little bit, avoiding scrutiny when at all possible.

Bills authored in secret, minimal committee meetings.

And, before you know it, we are in the middle of some SPP spawned nightmare.

FLAME AWAY!!!

16 posted on 06/30/2007 1:57:36 PM PDT by upchuck (If you don't have borders, you won't have a nation ~ Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback

bump


20 posted on 06/30/2007 2:02:20 PM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (An American Patriot and an anti-Islam kind of fellow. (POI))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback
Many who used to 'tinfoil alert' any mention of NAU, TransHighway foreign port of Kansas City, SPP, etc., are now starting to realize something secretive may be going on.

A dozen states have state legislators who are looking into related issues and are trying to pass laws to restrict some of that activity.

This thread showed up today:

Bush losing 'fast track' trade powers
  Posted by yahoo
On 06/30/2007 10:53:32 AM CDT · 17 replies · 228+ views


news.yahoo.com ^
Bush losing 'fast track' trade powersPresident Bush loses his power Saturday to seal "fast track" trade agreements without intervention from Congress, where Democrats blame recent deals for sending U.S. jobs abroad. Since 1975, only one other president, Bill Clinton, has been stripped of that trade promotion authority, designed to speed the reduction of trade barriers and open new markets with other countries. Bush won't get it back again, and the next president might not either. House Democratic leaders, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and Rep. Charles Rangel of New York, whose Ways and Means Committee handles trade policy, said...

22 posted on 06/30/2007 2:05:53 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback
Well the "socialists" told us they'd sneak up on us and we'd become socialists ourselves without ever realizing it.. (SSA) Social Security payouts are PURE SOCIALISM.. not LIKE pure socialism but as pure as you can get..

The same tactics work for other things like Gramscian democracy(Hitlery)... i.e. BIG government republican SHOULD BE an oxymoron.. it isn't...

27 posted on 06/30/2007 2:16:22 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I am not against uniform legislation, just pre-emption of states rights and removal of states rights

In the 1960s that earned you screams of "Racist! Bigot!"

In fact, to this day any mention of "states rights" can trigger those Pavlovian responses. "States rights" are code words, you see.

"All power to government employees in Washington, D.C.!" Contempt and contumely for those who object. But times and technology have changed -- now we have free speech and the free press restored. Just ask the President and the Congress.

30 posted on 06/30/2007 2:23:00 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback

31 posted on 06/30/2007 2:25:15 PM PDT by angelcindy (I'm a Fed up Red (republican))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback

But...but...Linda Chavez and Lindsey Graham says this was all because we were racists!


34 posted on 06/30/2007 2:28:06 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hardback
But we don't want this Mr. Bush, Mr. Perry, Chamber of Commerce, Council of Foreign Relations. WE DON'T WANT THIS!


36 posted on 06/30/2007 2:30:15 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I read the CFR's Building a North American Community Report of an Independent Task Force Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales.

I think that Robert A. Pastor has done most of the responding to criticism. The report makes clear that there is no connection to government and contains opinions of the authors.

It did state that our nations would not lose their sovereignty and it acknowledged Mexico's myriad problems.

It did emphasize merging customs and customs regulations to the extent of having a single North American border. There was a lot more to the document, of course.

Fine. But IMO first clean up the corrupt, criminal ruling class of Mexico and give Mexicans a chance at home -- it's the shame of North America (if not the World) that Mexico is a third-world cesspool of ruling class thugs and criminal corruption.

Meanwhile, the governments of all three countries have people working "to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing. . . ."

Personally I do not want a cesspool of government criminal corruption being part of a community with the United States of America.

Call me a nut, nativist, bigot, racist, xenophobe.. please!

50 posted on 06/30/2007 2:59:45 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson