Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CholeraJoe

:’) Posnansky claimed Tiahuanaco was built as early as 15,000 BC, and tried to prop that up using some kind of solar alignment. He said here’s the alignment, but it doesn’t work now, it would only line up 17,000 years ago, voila, I’ve proved the city is that old. Neil Steede has refined that number to about 7000 BC. And of course, there’s no texts at the site which reveal that any astronomical alignments were in use, so that’s all imaginary anyway. Radiocarbon dates of the site run back to about 400 AD. Estimated abandonment was around 1000 AD.


5 posted on 06/29/2007 10:15:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated June 27, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
There is something unique about Tiahuanaco, I've yet to figure it out though.

Future archaeological suprises I've predicted for South America will include Tiahuanaco.

7 posted on 06/29/2007 10:19:58 AM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson