Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

THE BAD NENNDORF CONTROVERSY

The interrogation of captured suspects has always been an essential - and controversial - element in counter-espionage and counter-terrorist work. Different generations have faced this challenge in different ways, but all have faced a consistent issue: how to persuade a detainee to disclose reliable information in a useful period of time.

During the Second World War and its aftermath, when Britain was seeking to stabilize and denazify Germany, the Security Service played a key role in managing detainee interrogations. This effort, however, was accompanied by controversy which culminated in a scandal involving a British interrogation centre at Bad Nenndorf, Germany.

Camp 020 and ‘Tin Eye’ Stephens

During the war, the Security Service established an interrogation centre in Britain, Camp 020, in which captured German agents were interrogated and ‘broken’. Based in Latchmere House in south London, Camp 020 played a key role in the Security Service’s now legendary ‘Double Cross System’.

It achieved successes that were unprecedented in the history of warfare. The Security Service detected every wartime German spy who arrived in Britain and turned many of them into double agents.

Camp 020’s function, however, was not simply confined to the ‘Double Cross System’. The camp also provided useful information for Allied codebreakers at Bletchley Park. And in the closing stages of the war, it was responsible for ‘breaking’ several captured Nazi leaders - some of whom were then successfully tried by the Allies at Nuremberg.

The camp was run by Lt. Col. Robert ‘Tin Eye’ Stephens. By all accounts, Stephens was a formidable character who had an extraordinary ability to break even the hardest of spies. ‘Tin Eye’ - so called because of his thick monocle - used every kind of available ‘mental pressure’ to ‘break’ prisoners.

Much like Stephens himself, Camp 020 made for an ominous first impression. The camp was not designed for prisoners of war (POWs), but rather for captured civilian agents (spies). The Geneva Convention relates only to POWs and so did not apply to Camp 020, nor was it listed by the Red Cross. However, contemporary Security Service records - written without the intention of ever being declassified - reveal that Stephens persistently took a hard-line approach against the use of physical violence in interrogations.

‘Violence is taboo’, wrote Stephens in his in-house history of Camp 020 now available as a National Archives publication, “for not only does it produce answers to please, but it lowers the standard of information” [1]. Stephens put the unprecedented successes of Camp 020 down to the rule of non-violence. “Never strike a man” wrote Stephens in instructions for interrogators. “In the first place it is an act of cowardice. In the second place, it is not intelligent. A prisoner will lie to avoid further punishment and everything he says thereafter will be based on a false premise”.

Stephens’ orders are supported by other contemporary records, such as the diary of Guy Liddell, a future Deputy Director-General of the Security Service. These records show that Stephens sometimes went to extraordinary lengths to outlaw physical violence at Camp 020. On one occasion in September 1940, Stephens expelled a War Office interrogator from the camp for hitting a prisoner, the double agent TATE. As Liddell noted in his diary “It is quite clear to me that we cannot have this sort of thing going on in our establishment. Apart from the moral aspect of the whole thing, I am quite convinced that these Gestapo methods do not pay in the long run”. Stephens saw that the officer in question never returned to Camp 020.

At the end of the war, Stephens was posted to occupied Germany, where he was placed in charge of a new interrogation centre based at Bad Nenndorf, a spa town near Hanover in Lower Saxony. Stephens was the obvious choice to run the German camp: he had more experience of interrogating prisoners, and had more success in doing so, than anyone else in the British intelligence community.

Camp 020: MI5 and the Nazi Spies, ed. Oliver Hoare. Public Record Office (2000). ISBN 1903365082


4 posted on 06/15/2007 6:56:18 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


SEPTEMBER 2005 RELEASE OF SECURITY SERVICE FILES
German intelligence agents and suspected agents

Nicolay Hansen: file ref KV 2/1936

Nicolay Hansen

Nicolay Hansen was a Norwegian who was found to be working for the Germans. They dropped him into Scotland in September 1943 by parachute, carrying two radio transmitters. On landing, he made contact with two lorry drivers carrying loads of Aberdeen herring through the night at Frasenburgh and surrendered to the authorities.

Hansen handed over his wireless sets with a story that he had been ordered to hand in one radio transmitter but keep the other hidden.

After he was released from custody, he was to find a job in the Scottish coalmines. He was then supposed to retrieve the second set and begin relaying messages to Germany.

However, secret writing material was found hidden in one of Hansen’s tooth cavities by interrogators at Camp 020. It was realised that this whole story might be a ruse and he may have been intended to communicate by letter rather than wireless. The Service considered using Hansen as a double agent but quickly discarded the idea. There was then a lengthy debate about whether he could be prosecuted without jeopardising the safety of Camp 020.

The file includes very detailed reports on the case and chronologies of the tale according to Hansen. It includes such items of interest as the reports of the lorry drivers who first found him, and assessments of Hansen’s capabilities and characters. Hansen was imprisoned for the remainder of the war.


5 posted on 06/15/2007 6:58:36 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Calpernia
The camp was not designed for prisoners of war (POWs), but rather for captured civilian agents (spies). The Geneva Convention relates only to POWs and so did not apply to Camp 020, nor was it listed by the Red Cross.

The 1940s Guantanamo?

Are not terrorists also by definition captured civilian agents rather than POWs?

6 posted on 06/15/2007 7:09:12 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Diversity in theory is the enemy of diversity in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson