To: TChris
"It's the little word "must" in that sentence that hangs up in my throat."
Same for me, and I'm a past president of our local Linux user group.
I was never all that hot on the politics of the free software movement. I just loved Unix, and thought it was really cool that people were volunteering their time and talent to make sure anyone could have a Unix for their PC. Stallman has become every more militant though, with every passing year, and I'm playing around with FreeBSD now (which has a really free license...as long as you give credit where its due for the code you've recieved, you can do any damn thing you want with it). There's a real schism brewing right now in the open source community (not the same as the free software community...important differences) over GPL version 3. Linus Torvalds has said the Linux kernel is not going to adopt v3 of the license, but FSF partisans say "oh yeah, how are you going to use a Linux distro without all the libraries and user space code that will be v3?", which is frankly, a kind of threat. And I don't like being threatened.
7 posted on
06/13/2007 1:39:50 PM PDT by
DesScorp
To: DesScorp
To be clear torvalds has said none of the versions he has seen are acceptable for Linux but is open to the idea of going GPL3 should his concerns be addressed..
8 posted on
06/13/2007 2:19:48 PM PDT by
N3WBI3
(Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson