Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

btw...you or soccermom said I would not be defending Rosie if she were in trouble....it would depend on the circumstances.

I defended Martha Stewart as being singled out here and she is no babe and certainly a huge liberal.

I base my views on what is presented as fair, customary or just plain facts in these cases from all I can glean from folks who should know in the papers and on TV. The emotive reasoning on display here and ijn the general public should be irrelevant.

You and others keep on and on about so much tangential stuff that has nothing to do with the circumstances of her charges and sentencing. The tangential stuff(slut, drugs, liberal, no boundaries, etc) should not matter except in the court of public opinion which ya’ll are admiteedly on the majority side.

It seems like vindicative spectator sport to me but have fun. We’re beating dead horses here.


810 posted on 06/10/2007 10:11:38 AM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 807 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy
Her behaviour certainly is relevant. Character is relevant to sentencing. And the court recognizes that by having probation do a report on CHARACTER.

You minimize her disregard for law. If you had not paid a fine in 6 months nor attended court ordered drunk driving class and got caught DOSL, how long would YOU get in jail? Longer than Paris.

812 posted on 06/10/2007 10:54:23 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson