Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

This is dumb. First its 45, then its 23, then its 3, then its 45 again. It is enough to make you scream. There should be an understandable law with clear sentences, whatever they may be. Unless she violated her parole, she shouldn’t go from 3 to 45 — even if she shouldn’t have gone from 45 to 3 in the first place.


47 posted on 06/08/2007 12:30:56 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine

This is dumb. First its 45, then its 23, then its 3, then its 45 again. It is enough to make you scream. There should be an understandable law with clear sentences, whatever they may be. Unless she violated her parole, she shouldn’t go from 3 to 45 — even if she shouldn’t have gone from 45 to 3 in the first place.

I say add them together, and then double it.


369 posted on 06/08/2007 2:40:08 PM PDT by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine
The sentence was 45 days. When she went in, she got an automatic one half off for ‘good behavior’. (If one is bad time can be added back on.) For some unknown reason, she was let out in ‘5’days (actually something like 40 hours). Apparently no one was able to justify the early release to the judge. She now gets nothing off for good behavior, and she spends 40 more days in jail, for 45 total.

Poor Baby. (She apparently also counted her chickens while they were still in the basket. (i.e. eggs))

372 posted on 06/08/2007 2:40:34 PM PDT by NathanR (Apr?s moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson