Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

There are no words ... except tubal ligation.
1 posted on 06/01/2007 3:05:34 AM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rainbow sprinkles
The father of the latest set of twins

Josh's dating scene must really suck.
2 posted on 06/01/2007 3:15:55 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles

This is disgusting! Sometimes I wish that you had to get a linsence to have children AND then you had to be no younger than 25. It is appauling that these losers are bringing in six children into this world at age 20 with no prospects of caring for them financially. Even people who are twenty having their first children are not mature enough to handle it. My wife and I were 29 when we had our first after seven years of marriage. Now that is a perfect scenario. We have three now and we never worry about where the next meal comes, did not even qualify for WIC. Why more folks don’t think like we do is sad.


3 posted on 06/01/2007 3:20:09 AM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles

What does she have a fertility IV continully dripping into her?


4 posted on 06/01/2007 3:36:21 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles; Lijahsbubbe; aculeus; dighton; martin_fierro
The father of the latest set of twins hopes he's ready.

Should we leap to the conclusion that he fathered both of them? I think that's quite a stretch!

5 posted on 06/01/2007 3:40:35 AM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles
four-year-old Natalie, three-year-old twins Adam and Sebastian and two-year-old twins Rachel and Raquel

Count 'em - that is SEVEN kids being raised by these parasites on society, once the last set is born.

6 posted on 06/01/2007 3:46:29 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles
"But with neither the 21-year-old father nor the 20-year-old mother employed - all the children are supported by welfare - the young family faces financial and emotional obstacles. "

America the beautiful. Pretty soon, everyone will just quit working.

8 posted on 06/01/2007 4:05:07 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles

Is she legal?


9 posted on 06/01/2007 4:16:30 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles

This is great. My tax dollars at work supporting deadbeats. I seen a couple of weeks ago where 56% of the US population receives some sort of governement assistance. I guess that’s why I have to keep working.


10 posted on 06/01/2007 4:24:57 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles
The father of the latest set of twins hopes he's ready.

What do the fathers of the other sets of twins have to say?

Geez....

23 posted on 06/01/2007 7:33:47 AM PDT by Nea Wood (I'm not a bad Christian because I refuse to join you in giving other people's stuff away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles

Well, isn’t that special.


28 posted on 06/01/2007 11:42:03 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles
There was an old woman who lived in a shoe.
She had so many children she didn't know what to do.

Obviously.

29 posted on 06/01/2007 11:45:12 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles

... neither the 21-year-old father nor the 20-year-old mother employed - all the children are supported by welfare


33 posted on 06/01/2007 4:28:02 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rainbow sprinkles

It’s an appalling story. But the girl has the “freedom” to do what ever she wants.

And we have the “freedom” to revoke her welfare, through legislation. Would you do it?

We have the “freedom” to deny her hospital care and surgery to deliver them. Would you do it?

A hundred years ago, most of her babies would die. Every day 40,000 babies die of starvation.

Rather than complain and become outraged — we need to either make hard decisions to let these people die, or accept the fact that the US has a safety net for it’s weakest members.

Those are the only two choices.


37 posted on 06/02/2007 10:02:01 AM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson