I have no idea. Maybe we will find out one day. But she certainly goes out of her way to either first deny, and when that fails, try to legally prevent exposure of anything she has done in the past. Just another self-promoting BS artist. But I suppose that if one uses the Jimmy Swaggert philosophy of life whatever you do is fine as long as AFTER you are caught you own up to it. But arguing is pointless. In the long run she is nothing more than entertainment with little credibility.
Just so you'll know, protecting one's privacy concerning things done in the past does not meet the definition of hypocrisy. That only applies if she's currently doing things that she privately condemns, you see.
Now that we've dispensed with that, how is she a phony?