This should be interesting...where is that danged popcorn eating animated gif file when you need it?
I don’t know, I kind of believe it’s true. Because how else could linux suck so bad if it weren’t a stripped down clone of Windows?
Just take everything that sucks about Windows and magnify it 20 to 30 times and you have linux!
Hmmm, I wonder if Microsoft is going to try to get Google (who can probably raise more cash than MS) to give their vast Linux based server farms.
Lawyers all around must be salivating at the possible retainers and billable hours.
Dear billg: all your base are belong TO US.
Microsoft needs to concentrate on what it does best : writing operating systems that tattle home to Redmond if it thinks you’re doing something shady.
Sounds like Microsoft isn’t worried at all. Bet they can prove code for code processes.
Pot, meet kettle.
Is there another Micro-Soft about which I am unaware?
Unix Expo
Remarks by Bill Gates
October 9, 1996
MONICA VILA: Good morning. Welcome to day two of Unix Expo Plus, the Internet plus Intranet show. Yesterday we reflected on the rapid change of technology and how the dividing lines between various aspects of IT have evolved and the dividing lines are becoming so blurred. I was reflecting this morning that featuring Microsoft at a Unix show is an event that probably wouldn't have occurred just a few years ago. Yet it's very relevant today, given Microsoft's position in enterprise computing.
It is rare we get an opportunity to listen first-hand to someone who's impacted our industry so profoundly for such a long time. Please join me in welcoming Mr. Bill Gates, president and CEO of Microsoft Corporation.
MR. GATES: Good morning. I hope I'm not out of place here. I'm curious, before I start out, how many people here have ever used a Windows-based computer? (Laughter.) All right, all of you.
Well, the reason I'm here at this Unix show is to talk about some of the very exciting developments taking place on both the hardware and software side that are allowing systems to work together more than ever before, and, in fact, allowing some of the benefits of the whole PC world spill over into the work station and Unix server world.
If we go way back in time, Microsoft was actually the first one to go to AT&T and beg to get a nice high-volume commercial license for Unix. And for many, many years we were the highest volume licensee, not only for our own Xenix products, but Siemens with theirs, Santa Cruz with theirs, and dozens and dozens of sub-licensees.
I have to admit, it was fairly difficult to work with AT&T back then. They simply didn't understand what they had. They didn't understand how to manage the asset, either in terms of promoting it properly or in terms of making sure that there wasn't fragmentation in how different implementations were put together. And so that vacuum in leadership created a bit of a dilemma for everybody who was involved in Unix.
Well, Microsoft stepped back and looked at that situation and said that the best thing for us might be to start from scratch: build a new system, focus on having a lot of the great things about Unix, a lot of the great things about Windows, and also being a file-sharing server that would have the same kind of performance that, up until that point, had been unique to Novell's Netware.
And through Windows NT, you can see it throughout the design. In a weak sense, it is a form of Unix. There are so many of the design decisions that have been influenced by that environment. And that's no accident. I mean, we knew that Unix operability would be very important and we knew that the largest body of programmers that we'd want to draw on in building Windows NT applications would certainly come from the Unix base.
Well, today Windows NT has achieved very high volume, and I think it's fair to say that it's both complementary and competitive to all the different flavors of Unix that are out there -- Solaris, HPUX, AIX. Excuse me if I've forgotten your favorite flavor as I go through those....
If you want to track the interesting part of the story, look for the actual list of patents being violated. M$ refuses to supply the exact ones.
This is laughable coming from someone who got there start from ripping off CP/M and calling it DOS.
Who here remembers WordStar. LOL
I read and re-read that article. You’d think that with 235 patent violations, the author could have included details on at least one as an example. As it is, there’s more evidence to support Algore’s global warming claims than there is to support MSFT’s patent claims.
Since when is one of the biggest buisness storys of our time considered chat?
Well this is interesting. Normally if a company looks like a threat to microsoft they just buy them out.
But since you can’t buy open source out you have to kill it.
This means MS views it as a real threat.
microsoft reminds me of a spoiled kid,
you just wish they’d shut up!