Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet

Frankly anybody can write an operating system. Since a patent is on actual code and your code will be different without doubt, home free. Is it possible to disable 95% of this Windows stuff so the computer boots up in less than a cigarette and cup of coffee?


2 posted on 05/13/2007 4:08:53 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

Get more random access memory (RAM). If running Vista, a notorious memory hog, make that at least 4 GB of RAM. Or install Linux and pay the bribes that Microsoft demands of you.


5 posted on 05/13/2007 4:12:02 PM PDT by dufekin (Name the leader of our enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
Patents are not on “actual code”. Copyrights cover actual code.

This article states that Microsoft is claiming patent infringement. Given the broad brush that corporations used to develop their patent portfolios beginning in the early 1990’s, I would suspect that MS can probably identify a large number of patent infringements. The fact that they are challenging “open source” just makes their job easier.

14 posted on 05/13/2007 4:19:16 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
Since a patent is on actual code and your code will be different without doubt, home free.

Huh? Maybe you are thinking of copyright?

A software patent is not on actual code. For example, the Unisys patent on the LZW compression algorthim (which has expired) described the algorithm and provided code in Fortran. But if you rewrote it in C, you would still have had to license it from Unisys because it was the algorthim that was patented, not the bits.

19 posted on 05/13/2007 4:23:39 PM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
Not so. Look up the old case, Lotus v. Paperback Software, 1991. The court (incredibly!) ruled that, although Adam Osborne's spreadsheet code was indeed unique, Paperback's software had the same ''look and feel'' as 1-2-3, and thus was in violation of copyright for some reason or other (this latter was NEVER coherently explained, btw). ''Look and feel'', eh?

The net result implied, of course, was that a company can get protected status for ... a series of keystrokes! The originality of the code apparently constitutes no defense.

26 posted on 05/13/2007 4:28:28 PM PDT by SAJ (debunking myths about markets and prices on FR since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale; the_Watchman; Mannaggia l'America
Sometimes software patents are not even algorithms. They can be methods, as well as concepts. IBM has a patent on "ecommerce over the web", and there was a dispute between IBM and Amazon on this. Somebody else patented hyperlinking, which makes the entire Internet since the days of the Gopher protocol a giant patent violation.

I'm all for patenting new, real software inventions. But unfortunately, most software patents are B.S. They are not "inventions" per se.

Some software patents are bogused because they patent something which has already been invented by someone else. This is patent poaching. But the patent approval process collapsed under both ignorance of the software industry and the sheer number of patent applications.

Now everyone who has anything to do with creating software is patenting everything it can, so as to protect itself from patent poachers.

43 posted on 05/13/2007 5:01:01 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
Frankly anybody can write an operating system.

Yes, but writing decent code is beyond the capabilities of Microsoft India.

Cheers!

53 posted on 05/13/2007 5:18:18 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
One place to look for slow boot times is the av/fw "suite". I made the mistake of upgrading mine to their latest and
greatest, and it takes forever to boot, their virtual drivers aren't that robust, etc. I swear they're Symantec/Norton repackaged...
73 posted on 05/13/2007 6:40:59 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson