Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveLoneRanger
Speaking of which, before being banned from CreationWiki, I helped write some objections to the evolutionary tale of human sexuality that might be useful to look over.

Urgh? What's the story behind that? Were they trying to keep it contained to their clique of editors or was it something else?

So, one might ask, what survival advantage is the production of sperm without the production of an egg? None, obviously. Sperm are totally useless without an egg, just as an egg is totally useless without a sperm. So neither sperm nor egg could have developed alone.

And until the capacity to produce both sperm and egg was fully developed, both were totally useless, thus having no survival advantage, and thus not being aided by the evolutionary mechanism of "millions of generations."

OMGoodness. You need to hit the library and do some research on anisogamy. So many of your objections have been addressed. It's like you assume scientists are all total idiots not to notice this irredeemable flaw, when in actuality the flaw does not exist! You do zero research on the proposed evolutionary path and then leap in at the very end of it and say that it would be impossible for the path to have begun there. Perhaps, but it didn't begin there!

62 posted on 05/02/2007 6:11:28 AM PDT by ahayes ("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: ahayes
So many of your objections have been addressed.

Addressed, but not proven.

Merely talking about how something MIGHT have happened proves exactly nothing.

76 posted on 05/02/2007 2:05:41 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson