Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce
They didn't "dump the entire Red Hat Linux product line."

Once again, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. The entire "Red Hat Linux" product line was dumped, read the link I posted. "Red Hat Enterprise Linux" is a completely different product line, no wonder I find so many holes in your arguments, I know the subject better than you do LOL. Back to the subject at hand, better find something else to criticize Microsoft over, since they're obviously smoking you on product support lifespan.

32 posted on 04/10/2007 6:38:16 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle
I know the subject better than you do LOL.

LOL. You don't even read your own posts. You said the entire family--not product line.

BTW--I don't take wikipedia as gospel, and neither do you when it suits you to disagree.

33 posted on 04/10/2007 6:44:47 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Golden Eagle; ShadowAce
I think we should be clear to everyone here on the board what we are talking about.

Red Hat used to sell support and still give away their OS (which was called Red Hat Linux) with entitlements so you could get updates off of their site. Because their OS was free to upgrade they had a rather short life-cycle (4 years if I remember correctly). but you could update to the next OS for free so it was no huge deal.

In 2003(?) Redhat decided to change its business model and cease to provide entitlements for free (They also stopped providing the iso’s or binary packages for their OS for free). To avoid confusion the took the current RedHat Release (Red Hat 9) and renamed it RedHat Enterprise Linux (Version 2.1). Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) was put on a slower development cycle, 18-24 months per release and given a longer support cycle of 7 years.

At the same time RedHat started the Fedora Project which would continue providing RedHat Linux for free with update support to the Linux community. To avoid confusion they copied RedHat 9 and started calling it Fedora Core. While Redhat Fronted everything needed to start the organization they did not run it (but do provide a huge amount of directional guidance).

The Fedora Project Took over where RedHat left off it is a distribution which is bleeding edge and has a short turn around for updates. The Fedora project also continued providing support for Red Hat Linux 7/8/9 for some years after those names were discontinued.

People using RedHat 7/8/9 had several choices when RedHat made the move:

(1) Continue using RedHat Linux with updates from the Fedora Project (Which many did for a good long time)
(2) Pony up the money and start using RHEL (Which is the direction I took my shop into)
(3) Switch to a different Distro or OS

The move by Red Hat horked off many people (myself included) but it has ensured the health of Red Hat the company and in the end its always nice to have a vendor who will be around awhile. It was a great business decision by Redhat and they have went out of their way to make it up to their customers.

35 posted on 04/11/2007 7:18:44 AM PDT by N3WBI3 ("Help me out here guys: What do you do with someone who wont put up or shut up?" - N3WBI3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson