**Except the boat is allegedly in the name of a company that Stern owns**
wouldn’t that be “illegal ‘conversion’ of property”? a big no-no
IIrc, on the death of a C-level stockholder, the survivors are legally entitled to a ‘buy-out’ of their interest or participation in that company (recalling coca-cola CEO case)
I'm thinking that when they bought the boat that is when it was transferred into a companies name, if indeed it was. I don't think Stern did it after Anna's death.
Probably alot of things of Anna's were put into corporations' names.