Posted on 04/03/2007 5:42:29 AM PDT by Mia T
Better than a rat infested gutter Rudy comes from.
I look at the complete package.
1-No one better to prosecute the war.
2-No one better to keep the clintons out of the White House
3-No one better with a chance to run the board
4-No one better to lead this bitterly divided country
Guliani is using Lockyer?
Lockyer is the absolute worst kind of liberal to be associated with. That man has serious problems.
Good God, Guliani might as well hire Terry McAuliff to be his campaign manager.
Seriously I was impressed with Guliani’s miracle work in NYC, and I looked forward to seeing him in the number 2 spot or a Cabinet post where his reputation as a fighter could be used tactically.
But Lockyer? I wonder if Guliani’s campaign organization has grown so big that underlings are branching out and contracting without Guliani’s oversight.
Not a good sign.
I requested that ‘fries Fred’ be removed from title. If it’s not removed by morning, I’ll make a second request.
And Giuliani is thrice-married adulterer that supports using taxpayer's money to kill unborn children, has supported partial-birth infanticide, has taken money from organizations that support the slaughter of the unborn and has stated homosexual is good and normal.
It's a little hard to claim the moral high ground when your candidate is just as morally bankrupt as the one you're supporting.
That is totally ridiculous. Giuliani will NEVER unite this country.
Lee Rodgers/Melanie Morgan on KSFO were flabbergasted as well, and turned him down.
As I said, I disagree with your claim of equivalence.
I’m for the protection of ALL our children, the living, the unborn and the not yet even imagined.
Choosing doctinal purity over keeping the clintons out of the White House imperils ALL of our children.
I agree. I never said Rudy would ‘unite the country.’ The extreme left and the extreme right are separatist by definition.
doctrinal
Conversely, Rudy is the best candidate to defeat the clintons and prosecute the war. Hence, he is the best candidate to protect ALL the children.
If that were true, you wouldn't supporting a man so morally devoid that he opposed outlawing partial-birth abortion, received more money from NARAL than Hillary did and wanted taxpayers to pay for the killing of the unborn.
Stop trying to claim you or anyone else supporting this moral midget are any better than those supporting Hillary. You're not.
You have no credibility any more with me when you criticize the Clintons. Your criticism isn't about right or wrong, it's about helping the Republicans win elections no matter how much principle you have to abandon.
He won’t unite the GOP, either. There will be a mass exodus if he is nominated.
You people keep saying this with NOTHING to back it up.
Giuliani doesn’t have superpowers. He’s NOT a “warrior”. He has NEVER “stood up against the terrorists”. He remained calm after 9/11. That’s about it.
Novak did the same thing in my mind with this, which is supposed to be a good part of the reason he should be taken seriously:
"Sophisticated social conservative activists tell me ... they are coming to see Thompson as the only conservative who can be nominated. Their appreciation of him stems not from his eight years as a U.S. senator from Tennessee but from his role as Manhattan district attorney on the TV series 'Law & Order.'
This is just embarrassing.
You miss the point. I am trying to make sure the clintons don’t win.
We may very well have hillary clinton vs Rudy Giuliani in ‘08. What do you do?
If you don’t vote, or if you vote 3rd party, you are helping to elect hillary clinton.
And clinton WILL appoint pro-abortion justices. Rudy will appoint strict constructionists.
clinton WILL aid and abet the terrorists. Rudy will nail them.
clinton will resume selling off our national secrets, national resources and sovereignty to the highest foreign bidder. Rudy will protect them.
And clinton WILL resume abusing power on a massive scale. (Remember the Barrett report?)
Any person who is fully informed about the clintons and yet helps to return them to power is either grossly myopic or grossly immoral.
If you are right, the poll numbers will reveal this. Thus far, I don’t see it. To the contrary.
Some would disagree. He stood up against the Mafia. He refused the Saudi blood money. He ejected Arafat.
that it is. Thx for the heads up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.