Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Sparky

As I said, I disagree with your claim of equivalence.

I’m for the protection of ALL our children, the living, the unborn and the not yet even imagined.

Choosing doctinal purity over keeping the clintons out of the White House imperils ALL of our children.


128 posted on 04/03/2007 8:21:12 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


doctrinal


130 posted on 04/03/2007 8:27:35 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Conversely, Rudy is the best candidate to defeat the clintons and prosecute the war. Hence, he is the best candidate to protect ALL the children.


131 posted on 04/03/2007 8:30:34 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
I’m for the protection of ALL our children, the living, the unborn and the not yet even imagined.

If that were true, you wouldn't supporting a man so morally devoid that he opposed outlawing partial-birth abortion, received more money from NARAL than Hillary did and wanted taxpayers to pay for the killing of the unborn.

Stop trying to claim you or anyone else supporting this moral midget are any better than those supporting Hillary. You're not.

You have no credibility any more with me when you criticize the Clintons. Your criticism isn't about right or wrong, it's about helping the Republicans win elections no matter how much principle you have to abandon.

132 posted on 04/03/2007 8:38:51 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson