1 posted on
03/21/2007 8:32:14 PM PDT by
Calpernia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: wagglebee; Coleus; MHGinTN
2 posted on
03/21/2007 8:32:44 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
3 posted on
03/21/2007 8:33:30 PM PDT by
umgud
To: Calpernia
>>>we are reminded of this terrible mistake each and every time we look at her<<<
This wording is so wrong is so many ways.
4 posted on
03/21/2007 8:33:57 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
Howard J. Stern
Uh Oh...Bad move in a paternity case :)
To: Calpernia
6 posted on
03/21/2007 8:38:37 PM PDT by
2111USMC
To: Calpernia
7 posted on
03/21/2007 8:42:45 PM PDT by
paddles
To: Calpernia
Wrong turkey baster, I guess.
8 posted on
03/21/2007 8:43:33 PM PDT by
paddles
To: Calpernia
How......awkward.
Was the wife cheating? Who you gonna believe me or your lying eyes?!
9 posted on
03/21/2007 8:45:23 PM PDT by
TheDon
(The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
To: Calpernia
very sad.....
while I don't dismiss their right to be indignant, if indeed the baby is not theirs, I question why they would push this lawsuit with such hateful language towards the little girl.....
imagine growing up with parents who get sick looking at you....
10 posted on
03/21/2007 8:46:19 PM PDT by
cherry
To: Calpernia
11 posted on
03/21/2007 8:46:20 PM PDT by
Islander7
("Show me an honest politician and I will show you a case of mistaken identity.")
To: Calpernia
The Andrewses say that "while we love Baby Jessica as our own, we are reminded of this terrible mistake each and every time we look at her; it is simply impossible to ignore,'' the judge's decision says. Somehow, while I certainly sympathize with someone wanting the service they paid for, it would seem that if they really loved this baby as their own, they would forego a lawsuit in favor of not ruining this child's life. I mean, how must it feel to be this child, as she grows up understanding that she wasn't exactly what her parents wanted? Very sad.
susie
13 posted on
03/21/2007 8:46:41 PM PDT by
brytlea
(amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
To: Calpernia
The judge said the Andrews' complain that they have been forced to raise a child who is "not even the same race, nationality, color ... as they are.''Good gravy, what a bigoted complaint. Simply deplorable. I hope the mother in this case still understands that she is the child's mother, no matter what the screwup at the fertility doc's.
I can see them suing for some kind of damages for the malpractice, but complaining that the infant is "not even the same race, nationality, color ... as they are" is awful. Many, many adopted children have a similar circumstance, and their adoptive parents are no less their parents because of it.
15 posted on
03/21/2007 8:48:08 PM PDT by
HitmanLV
("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
To: Calpernia
I pray he is man enough not to hold any ill-will against this child
17 posted on
03/21/2007 8:50:36 PM PDT by
Nokia
To: Calpernia
Give it up for adoption. Their are many loving couples that wouldn't have the angst this couple has. Branjolie is a perfect example!
19 posted on
03/21/2007 8:51:34 PM PDT by
Young Werther
( and Julius Ceasar said, "quae cum ita sunt.")
To: Calpernia
The Andrewses say that "while we love Baby Jessica as our own, we are reminded of this terrible mistake each and every time we look at her; it is simply impossible to ignore,'' the judge's decision says.
"We are conscious of and distressed by this mistake each and every time we appear in public,'' the judge quoted the Andrewses' affidavit as saying. I think they child is going to be embarassed to be with such 'parents' in public, too.
22 posted on
03/21/2007 8:54:04 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: Calpernia
Well if these selfish racists don't want her, Mr. Fairview and I will give her a happy home, where she can be thoroughly loved for her own sweet self.
24 posted on
03/21/2007 8:54:50 PM PDT by
Fairview
( Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.)
To: Calpernia
Nancy Andrews asked Keltz about this "abnormality,'' the judge said, and the physician told her the condition was normal, that the in vitro fertilization was done properly and that the child would "get lighter over time.'' Well, it worked for Michael Jackson.
32 posted on
03/21/2007 9:10:32 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Calpernia
33 posted on
03/21/2007 9:11:11 PM PDT by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
To: Calpernia
Gee whiz..
In the olden days God never would have screwed up like this....
36 posted on
03/21/2007 9:14:12 PM PDT by
late bloomer
( Neglegere homo pone aulaeum. semi-retired warlord)
To: Calpernia
Ingrates. They have a child which they couldn't have done on their own. And he "has the wrong skin". Long Island couple. Uh huh.
Egotists.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson