LMAO! "stupid" is somebody claiming Jokelaw is independent of IBM when IBM is paying to host their website. Or claiming Jokelaw info is accurate when they've been denying that connection and even caught covering up for illegal hacking. But since it does involve "leftist loons" and illegal hacking, it's no surprise you 2 are here defending it.
IBM is no more paying to host groklaw than MS is paying to host webites at the rather large number of universities to which they donate or to which they pay for advertising.
I saw an Add for MS on slashdot the other day does that mean any pro MS material on that site is driven by ms "paying to host" their site?
"Or claiming Jokelaw info is accurate"
Can you find any instance of them altering the court documents they are publishing?