Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: shadowman99
You can slam Groklaw all you want, but you never cite any factual inaccuracies.

Sure I have, like when Jokelaw kept insisting the denial of service attacks against SCO's website weren't even happening at all much less coming from anyone in the Linux "community" just to have Eric Raymond come out and admit they were, not that anyone should have been surprised. Even several of the original posters like Br3n (?) got fed up with the inaccuracies and left, and when I pointed out lies my posts were pulled and I was told quote "this site does not allow debate". Even other open source advocates have pointed out inaccuracies, if you're not aware or too brainwashed to admit it don't blame me, do a simple search for "groklaw wrong" or similar and see what all comes up.

The funniest thing of all was when Linus Torvalds himself showed up and got into such a heated disagreement PJ threatened to ban him, then told him her mother preferred Windows LOL.

15 posted on 03/16/2007 2:23:02 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle
And do you seriously think those (lame) examples have impact on the SCO vs. IBM case?

Some bellyaching about a DOS that had nothing to do with IBM or Groklaw, some vauge complaints about inacuracies by readers who packedup and left?

The shouting match with Linux concerned the GPL v.3, so that has nothing to do with the SCO case.

Whoever is paying you to astroturf isn't getting their money's worth.

17 posted on 03/16/2007 2:59:53 PM PDT by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson