Some bellyaching about a DOS that had nothing to do with IBM or Groklaw, some vauge complaints about inacuracies by readers who packedup and left?
The shouting match with Linux concerned the GPL v.3, so that has nothing to do with the SCO case.
Whoever is paying you to astroturf isn't getting their money's worth.
It shows Jokelaw is full of BS, including even providing excuses and protection for illegal hackers. Search any engine for "groklaw wrong" I said, but if you want an example of where Jokelaw blew the facts of the case here's one right here:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040428235932742
Meanwhile here were the facts, posted from a more reliable Linux supporter, who still failed to call Jokelaw out for their BS:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1581586,00.asp?kc=EWNKT0209KTX1K0100440