Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First tail fin for 787 rolls off assembly line
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | March 14, 2007 | JAMES WALLACE

Posted on 03/15/2007 12:00:37 AM PDT by skeptoid

The Boeing Co. marked the completion Wednesday of the first of what it hopes will be thousands of composite tail fins for its hot-selling 787 Dreamliner.

The 33-foot-long tail fin is the largest structural piece of the 787 that Boeing is manufacturing. Its partners around the world are making the rest. .....snip...

Making composite parts for Boeing jets is nothing new for Boeing's Composites Manufacturing Center. Workers here have been responsible for the composite tail fin and horizontal stabilizer of the 777 for about 13 years. Late last year, the unit delivered the 600th 777 composite empennage.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattlepi.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 787; boeing; composite; tailfin
It's not the empennage that I think about late at night.
1 posted on 03/15/2007 12:00:42 AM PDT by skeptoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

Cool


2 posted on 03/15/2007 12:38:47 AM PDT by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid


...Nancy Pelosi's new plane?


3 posted on 03/15/2007 1:00:24 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

If we can build the tailfin here then we should build the whole damn plane and not depend on Japan, Italy & China for other components.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2002465971_boeingchina02.html


4 posted on 03/15/2007 1:51:30 AM PDT by panaxanax (Ronald Reagan would vote for Duncan Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

Hope they can secure it better than Airbus's composite tail fin!


5 posted on 03/15/2007 3:56:12 AM PDT by Eclectica (Ask your MD about Evolution. Please!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eclectica
Hope they can secure it better than Airbus's composite tail fin!

Got somethin' agin composites?

6 posted on 03/15/2007 4:43:58 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

Where is the Jaws music?


7 posted on 03/15/2007 4:46:56 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is time to stop the left at the wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
If we can build the tailfin here then we should build the whole damn plane and not depend on Japan, Italy & China for other components.

Do you think Boeing wants to sell planes to airlines in Japan, Italy and China?

8 posted on 03/15/2007 6:04:57 AM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: green iguana

Of course they do, but we shouldn't be held hostage and have to let them build our airplane parts. Americans need jobs more than Chinese do.

Globalist ass-kissing is all it is.


9 posted on 03/15/2007 7:20:33 AM PDT by panaxanax (Ronald Reagan would vote for Duncan Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

why should we do that if other people can do it more efficiently? That sort of protectionism drives up prices and would make boeing uncompetitive, one of the reasons it is beating airbus.


10 posted on 03/15/2007 9:35:48 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

If American unionized workers would build a competitive product Boeing would buy it.

Pretty simple, really.


11 posted on 03/15/2007 9:44:09 AM PDT by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

Held hostage? By what?

Better value?


12 posted on 03/15/2007 9:44:59 AM PDT by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
"why should we do that if other people can do it more efficiently? That sort of protectionism drives up prices and would make boeing uncompetitive, one of the reasons it is beating airbus.

You mean why shouldn't we send American dollars off to China so they can continue building their military and then come kick our asses? We're buying the rope that we will be hung with.

13 posted on 03/15/2007 10:37:55 AM PDT by panaxanax (Ronald Reagan would vote for Duncan Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

"why should we do that if other people can do it more efficiently?"

See what happens when we send our technology overseas:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/62138fe6-d575-11db-a5c6-000b5df10621.html


14 posted on 03/18/2007 6:48:59 PM PDT by panaxanax (Ronald Reagan would vote for Duncan Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson