Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

787 engine performs well in first test flight (Initial step toward certifying design)
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | Friday, February 23, 2007 | James Wallace, P-I aerospace reporter

Posted on 02/23/2007 2:20:24 PM PST by Paleo Conservative

With the first flight of The Boeing Co.'s 787 only about six months away, the new General Electric engine that will power the Dreamliner made its first flight Thursday -- on the wing of a 747.

"The engine performed extremely well, and we look forward to gaining additional valuable information on the engine's capabilities from flight testing," Tom Brisken, general manager of the GEnx program, said in a statement. "Today's flight puts us another step closer to certification later this year on the GEnx-1B engine for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner."

The engine is being tested on what's known as a "flying test bed," in this case a modified 747.

Flying out of Victorville, Calif., the 747 climbed to more than 43,000 feet during the initial three-hour engine test.

Over the next three months, General Electric plans about three flights per week as part of the test program leading to engine certification.

Rolls-Royce is also developing an engine for the 787.

The GE and Rolls engines will be much more fuel-efficient than the jet engines that power today's planes.

"During the first flight, the GEnx-1B engine demonstrated aircraft systems and instrumentation functionality, and established engine performance baseline for flight testing," GE said.

The 787 Dreamliner program has entered a critical phase, with assembly of the first plane to begin at the Everett plant in the second quarter. Rollout of that jet will be in July, with first flight expected in late August or early September.

It is critical that the various 787 systems and components -- especially the engines -- work as advertised. Time is short, and Boeing can't afford any showstoppers. Boeing is supposed to deliver the first Dreamliner to All Nippon Airways of Japan in May 2008. Boeing does not want a repeat of what has befallen Airbus and the A380. That 555-passenger plane is two years late.

The GE 747 flying test bed has been used to test a number of new GE engines, including the GE90, which powers Boeing's 777.

Replacing one of the 747 engines with the 787 engine required modifications that were not previously needed. That's because the Dreamliner will be a much more electric plane than today's passenger planes, and it will not use bleed air. This means air will not be bled off the engines to power various 787 systems. This approach has not been used before on a commercial jetliner.

GE's 747 flying test bed was modified for the 787 engine to manage the electrical load from the engine's two starter-generators and to provide the power necessary for electrical ground and air starts. The modifications were completed last month, and the GEnx-1B engine was installed in the inboard location on the left wing in just one day, according to GE.

The majority of the flight tests will occur in Victorville, with some flights in Yuma, Ariz., to test hot weather performance. High-altitude takeoff evaluations will be done out of Colorado Springs, Colo. A second round of flight testing later this year will focus on the engine control system.

The GEnx began ground testing in March 2006, with engine certification scheduled for September.This same GE engine will be used to power Boeing's 747-8, which is now in development. But that engine will be changed slightly because the 747 needs bleed air.

The GEnx engine will succeed GE's CF6 engine family and will provide better fuel consumption and payload performance. The new engine has both a front fan case and fan blades made of composites, which provide for greater engine durability, weight reduction and lower operating costs.



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 787; aerospace; boeing; boeing787
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: COEXERJ145

It's my understanding that the CF series is a joint venture with the French. Do you know if this engine is part of the JV, or if it is all-American?


21 posted on 02/23/2007 3:39:33 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Actually, it was CFM International that was a joint venture between General Electric (which used the engine core from the F101 engine used on the B-1 bomber) and SNECMA (who developed the large front fan). The result was the world's most popular high-bypass turbofan engine, the CFM56 series; it's used on DC-8's, 737's, A320 Family planes, and the A340-200/300 series. The GE90 engine used on the Boeing 777 also used a lot of SNECMA parts, too.


22 posted on 02/23/2007 3:47:56 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

That's what's so interesting about the 747-800, the next generation 747 - it's going to have four of those GEnx-series engines on it.


23 posted on 02/23/2007 4:47:16 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
At the risk of seeming stupid,whatever happened to Pratt & Whitney engines? Was P&W bought up by GE? I know that P&W engines used to be,along with RR,about the most frequently employed engines on commercial airliners.

The buy in was too high on the 787, and Pratt didn't want to pony up the money.

Pratt is still kicking itself for not partnering with SNECMA on the 737-300 engine so they are waiting for the next gen 737.

Better 30 years late than never.

24 posted on 02/23/2007 7:08:16 PM PST by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
It's my understanding that the CF series is a joint venture with the French.

I have no idea what you are talking about, but it just seems to make sense!

25 posted on 02/24/2007 4:41:34 AM PST by bondjamesbond (No matter how PC you are, there's always somebody more PC than you, to condemn you as un-PC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: UNGN; Gay State Conservative
Pratt & Whitney are working on the geared turbofan for the next generation of 737s and A320s that will deliver dramatic improvements in fuel economy.
26 posted on 02/24/2007 6:52:51 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

See post 22 above for some background. It was the CFM engines that were made in a joint venture between GE and SNECMA.


27 posted on 02/24/2007 8:19:48 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
No comment on the GTF. I worked for Allied Signal which bought Lycoming (I think Lycoming invented the GTF, not sure).

When they closed the Stratford plant, all the Lycoming designers went up the road to East Hartford.

Having worked the Overhaul side of Lycoming geared Turbofans, all I will say is scaling it up to 5 times the thrust is a non trivial task and I personally would not stake my company on it's success or failure.

28 posted on 02/24/2007 7:09:13 PM PST by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: UNGN

I can imagine getting the MTBF of the transmission up to par with any other modern turbofan engine while still keeping it light enough is no trivial task.


29 posted on 02/26/2007 9:16:11 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson