Rudy supporter: Hunter's okay, I'll vote for him if he wins, but he doesn't look like he has a chance. He has no real executive experience, he has never even run a state-wide campaign.
Hunter supporter: Rudy's a gun-grabbing, wife-cheating, gay-lovin', baby-killing liberal! I'll never support him, and if you support him you're a liberal Rino too!
The Hunter folks seem hell-bent on dividing this group.
Maybe they're really D plants? :-)
The tone and language of these people (enraged, nasty, vicious, lots of name-calling) is familiar - reminiscent of the Buchanan Brigades.
Watch the broad brush! I am a Hunter supporter who will gladly vote for Rudy in the general election cause like I said - I like him.
Is there a lie in there somewhere? If so, what is it?
That is just plain hilarious. Look at the language that Jim Robinson used in his last two polls. Maybe HE's really a D plant? :-)
Let's just say that Hillary (or someone equally as vile) gets the Democrat nomination and a pro-life, anti-gay marriage, pro-gun, pro-defense, pro-borders, pro-small government, pro-low taxes, peace through superior firepower patriot gets the Republican nod. Who would you vote for in the general?
Looks like our true blue conservative did pretty well in our prior poll. Let's now see what happens if we nominate a social liberal who's okay with abortion, gay unions and gay rights is a gun grabber and is weak on illegal immigration. Who do you vote for in the general?