Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS not prepared for rain during Superbowl?
Self | 2/5/07 | Ted

Posted on 02/05/2007 6:09:11 AM PST by Ted

I was surprised that CBS seemed to have such a difficult time handling the rain during the game. It seemed to me that their 50 yd line primary camera was most affected, with water drops on the lens during much of the game, as well as a foggy picture for whatever reason. Other cameras had the same problems.

Did they not know it was going to rain, or even that there was a chance of rain? Don't they have covers for the lenses of those high dollar cameras, or at least they could have had an intern (or maybe Katie Couric) wiping off the water every minute or so? Seriously, I have seen many sports events televised in the rain and they typically figure out how to broadcast a better picture than what we had to endure last night.

The other frustration was that there were cameras that seemed more clear, yet the director would stick with the watered up lens. Really struck me as odd considering they probably spent a little bit of money broadcasting the biggest sports event in the USA.

Must be a budget crunch at the communist broadcasting network...


TOPICS: Sports; TV/Movies; Weather
KEYWORDS: hdtv; highdef; rainoncameralens; superbowl; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2007 6:09:15 AM PST by Ted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ted

CBS had Dan Rather with a squee-gee going camera to camera. Big place, lots of cameras.


2 posted on 02/05/2007 6:12:03 AM PST by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted

They were filming through gauze...in a failed attempt to make Rex Grossman look better.


3 posted on 02/05/2007 6:13:09 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted
I don't know what the ratings were, but, this was the first Superbowl since 1968 that I didn't even bother to watch.

Pro sports have lost their luster (to me), with the business-aspect having taken over the competitive nature. Players no longer stay with a team long-term, but simply job-hop for the millions and there are few of them that would even qualify as role models or heroes today, with their arrogance and hip-hop/rap mentality.

4 posted on 02/05/2007 6:13:33 AM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted

I thought maybe they were expecting Cybill Shepherd to walk into the frame.


5 posted on 02/05/2007 6:16:20 AM PST by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted
CBS had to hock all their good cameras to pay Katie.

But you're right, the TV coverage s-u-c-k-e-d. Almost as much as Grossman &%#@$ &$#@ $@#&*

(If I was GM I would have made him WALK back to Chicago, and he'd be CUT today!)

6 posted on 02/05/2007 6:18:02 AM PST by Condor51 (Where's Attila The Hun when you need him? [sit down Rudy. You &%$% undecided 'republican'])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted

Yeah, it was like watching old Star Trek reruns.


7 posted on 02/05/2007 6:18:43 AM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted

Lens and camera covers get water on them as well. The purpose of a cover is to protect the equipment, not to give you a perfect waterproof picture.

Seeing the water spots made me thankful I didn't spend thousands to go to Miami and sit in the rain. It was more akin to watching a Chicago-Buffalo game in freezing snow, while I sit in front of a warm fireplace watching.


8 posted on 02/05/2007 6:19:00 AM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted

I was laughing thinking how those wet lenses looked on someones' brand-new $10K HDTV screen.


9 posted on 02/05/2007 6:20:29 AM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted

Yeah, what was up with that? It was my thoughts exactly. The biggest sporting event of the year and they couldn't keep water off the lenses? I kept thinking that they were going to fix it. Were they actually watching the feed? I'll bet the NFL isn't going to be very happy about the quality of the picture.


10 posted on 02/05/2007 6:20:57 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted

I was watching the SciFi Channel...


11 posted on 02/05/2007 6:27:39 AM PST by johnny7 ("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth

Great replies all around. I laughed with you because I went over to a friends' house to watch it on his high def projection TV. 200 inch image on a wall in his house, and everything except the #$&**#!! football game was crystal clear!


12 posted on 02/05/2007 6:27:51 AM PST by Ted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ted

The cameras at the "Puppy Bowl" on Animal Planet seemed much better.


13 posted on 02/05/2007 6:33:08 AM PST by mnehring (Virtus Junxit mors non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted

Rain was in the forecast although most rain storms in Florida are intense in rainfall but short in duration. SeeBS has broadcast AFC games for years so they are quite familiar with the local conditions at the fish bowl. Too bad about all those fans who spent a small fortune to be there (hehehehehe). Anyway, it was SeeBS ... what did you expect?


14 posted on 02/05/2007 6:35:27 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Bowl cam was cool. Yes, it had the wet look, but by design.


15 posted on 02/05/2007 6:37:27 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance ("Campers laugh at clowns behind closed doors." GOHUNTER08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Bowl cam was cool. Yes, it had the wet look, but by design.


16 posted on 02/05/2007 6:37:34 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance ("Campers laugh at clowns behind closed doors." GOHUNTER08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

Sorry for the double.


17 posted on 02/05/2007 6:39:29 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance ("Campers laugh at clowns behind closed doors." GOHUNTER08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ted

Can you give me some specifics about his set up?

I'm about 3 mos. away from completing our new family room, and a clear 200 in. picture intrigues me. I don't know if I would care for a projecter, but I want to check all options before I lay out bucks for my big screen. I'd rather hear from those who've used it than from online "reviews" you never know if they are employed by the manufacturer or not.

Thanks,


18 posted on 02/05/2007 6:42:51 AM PST by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
The cameras at the "Puppy Bowl" on Animal Planet seemed much better.

Yes, but the water dish cam had the same problems with water and also puppy paws in the dish :-)
19 posted on 02/05/2007 6:44:45 AM PST by FreedomGuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

"Players no longer stay with a team long-term, but simply job-hop for the millions and there are few of them that would even qualify as role models or heroes today, with their arrogance and hip-hop/rap mentality."

You had strange timing to decide this was the year to quit watching. We had two of the classiest teams, organizations and coaches playing in the Super Bowl this year. We didn't see any "creative" touchdown celebrations and showboating last night by either team.

Secondly, the job-hopping in the NFL has as much to do with salary caps as it does player selfishness. I like the parity the salary cap has brought and the Colts have found a way to still keep their key players who have been there long-term.


20 posted on 02/05/2007 6:48:14 AM PST by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson