Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bay Area air regulators consider ban on wood fires
AP via SFGate ^ | 2/2/7

Posted on 02/02/2007 2:21:49 PM PST by SmithL

San Francisco Bay area air quality regulators are proposing a mandatory ban on wood fires in fireplaces and stoves when the air is bad.

Under the proposed rules, wood fires would be prohibited in the nine-county Bay Area on "Spare the Air" days — when air quality is expected to reach unhealthy levels.

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board has asked its staff to draft rule options so it can hold hearings on a proposed ban this summer.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: cleanairact; environment; epa; nannystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2007 2:21:51 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

How about a Spare the Rear day to help stop the spread of AIDS?


2 posted on 02/02/2007 2:23:19 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Should be enough Bay Area air regulators to build a good fire.


3 posted on 02/02/2007 2:25:56 PM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I am sure the duraflame I burn 10 times a year is the cause of this, it certainly is not the hundreds of thousands of cars which run daily.


4 posted on 02/02/2007 2:28:22 PM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
The problem is most likely cause by all the foul hot air spewed by these idiot bureaucrats
5 posted on 02/02/2007 2:30:05 PM PST by clamper1797 (What's black and brown and looks good on a lawyer ... a pair of Doberman's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
San Francisco, February 14th 2010(AP) It was a sad Valentine's Day for at least a dozen elderly Bay area citizens who were found frozen to death in their homes today. In all cases the gas lines had been cut off for failure to pay. Wood stoves were present in all the homes but were not used due to the anti-burn "spare the air" regulations.

"It is sad that they died but at least the air is clean", said Tempeh Rainbow, a county social worker investigating the case.

6 posted on 02/02/2007 2:36:16 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (A Muslim soldier can never be loyal to a non-Muslim commander.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Why does anyone choose to live on this planet of SF?


7 posted on 02/02/2007 2:36:21 PM PST by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why don't they just ban living in San Francisco and let it go back to the way it was 200 years ago.


8 posted on 02/02/2007 2:39:29 PM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Can a ban on farting be far behind?


9 posted on 02/02/2007 2:40:23 PM PST by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Say what you want. But after seeing this type of stuff for so long I now believe it empowers the left to take away pleasure. It allows them to chip away at your initiative to achieve and fight off their control.

50 years ago it would have been called Anti-Americanism.


10 posted on 02/02/2007 2:42:08 PM PST by Vision ("Delight yourself in the Lord; and he will give you your heart's desires." Psalm 37:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Seattle has burn-ban days, when a temperature inversion traps smoke low to the ground, and there's no wind to disperse it.

I still think it's silly. Wood smoke is not pollution. Wood smoke is a heavy particulate-laden smoke that is entirely natural and not chemically harmful. It will eventually disperse and/or settle to the ground. There's nothing particularly unhealthy about it.

I think I've even heard it said that it's not done for health reasons, but merely asthetic reasons. They're afraid that somebody's going to take a picture showing something other than crystal clear air.


11 posted on 02/02/2007 2:44:22 PM PST by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde
Why does anyone choose to live on this planet of SF?

The job I'm in now... is technically located at our company headquarters in the Bay Area. I took the job on a first condition that I could work in our Bellevue, WA office, and not move to SF. There was no way I would have accepted the position if I had to move to SF. Not for double the salary. Not worth it.

12 posted on 02/02/2007 2:48:02 PM PST by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
In a South Park epi, San Franciscans were farting into wine glasses to savor the smell.
13 posted on 02/02/2007 3:02:43 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

No smoking, no spanking, no fireplace,


14 posted on 02/02/2007 3:03:05 PM PST by Frankss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; Mears; ...

Nanny State PING...........

Time to throw another log on the woodstove........


15 posted on 02/02/2007 3:06:24 PM PST by Gabz (I like mine with lettuce and tomato, heinz57 and french-fried potatoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

No light bulbs, no grills no power mowers and no chain saws.

California - The Land of NO!


16 posted on 02/02/2007 3:08:06 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Celebrate Monocacy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I'm not gonna go there - to SF. Litterally. LOL.


17 posted on 02/02/2007 3:09:56 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFFi6gmSdQ8


18 posted on 02/02/2007 3:10:38 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (A Muslim soldier can never be loyal to a non-Muslim commander.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
In the 90s, they proposed an outright ban. And a ban on new home construction including "fireplaces".

From the article: The Bay Area air district issued voluntary no-burn advisory on 26 Spare the Air nights this winter, but many people lit fires those nights anyway, officials said.

19 posted on 02/02/2007 3:22:20 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

And the Mayor says make love..not campfires.


20 posted on 02/02/2007 3:22:37 PM PST by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson