Posted on 01/30/2007 1:08:55 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Windows Vista is "dramatically more secure than any other operating system released", Microsoft founder Bill Gates has told BBC News. Mr Gates said the security features in the new operating system were reason enough to upgrade from Windows XP. Microsoft launched Vista in London, with more than 100m computers predicted to be using it within 12 months. Mr Gates also defended the pricing of Vista, which is twice as expensive in Europe compared to the US.
The technology leader called the launch a "big day" that would bring a new digital workstyle and lifestyle.
The new operating system (OS) boasts an improved interface and security tools. Mr Gates said security in Vista would mean it would be "much, much harder" for malicious hackers to attack computers running the operating system. "For anybody worried about safety, whether it is phishing or malware or parental control type issues, Vista brings that to a whole new level of capability," he added. Security analysts have praised the improved tools in Vista but many feel that holes in the operating system eventually will be exposed and that Microsoft will continue to need to update it through online patches.
Microsoft will come under fire if Vista proves to be the popular target of malicious hackers exploiting flaws, said David Mitchell, the software practice leader at analysts Ovum. "It's crucial for corporate reputation and revenue that Vista proves more secure and stable than XP," he said. Not all PCs will be able to run Vista - Microsoft recommends machines have at least 512Mb of RAM, a 800Mhz processor and 15Gb of hard disk space.
Microsoft has pledged to continue support for XP users until 2011. The company launched Vista for business users two months ago. Now Vista has been released to consumers, who can buy four home versions. There is also a stripped down version of the OS, Vista Starter, which is aimed at customers in developing countries. It will be available in 70 languages and will run on slower and older PCs.
But Microsoft could face a backlash from consumers over its pricing plans - with the cost of Vista versions in the US roughly half the price of equivalent versions in the UK. Prices for the OS in the UK range from about £100 for an upgrade version of the Basic package to £249 for a copy of the upgrade to the Ultimate version of Vista. In the US prices start from $100 (£52) for an upgrade of Vista Home basic to $249 (£127) for the equivalent Ultimate version. Mr Gates defended Microsoft's pricing plans: "We try to keep our prices largely in line from country to country... but with price you do generally get some things that get a bit out of alignment as currencies go up and down. "Our goal across our product line is to largely have a global way of looking at things." Mr Mitchell said there was pent up consumer demand for Vista.
"In the consumer space there has not been any new release of a Windows operating system for five years," he said.
Ovum predicts that 15% of XP machines will be running Vista by the end of 2007. "Part of the appetite is 'something new for something new's sake'," said Mr Mitchell. Mr Mitchell predicted that the new graphical interface, called Aero, improved desktop search tools and a promise of more robust security would appeal to many users. But he predicted some consumers could be confused by the minimum specifications for PCs to run Vista and by the different versions on sale. Users can visit the Microsoft website to check if their hardware will run Vista and some new machines are being labelled Vista Capable or Premier Vista Ready, for those PCs with higher specifications. "There's been an attempt to demystify what the minimum specifications are," said Mr Mitchell. "Undoubtedly some people - as in any industry - won't read the instructions." In his interview with the BBC Mr Gates also predicted that school children would be using tablet PCs rather than text books in 10 years time. "We will have an inexpensive tablet-like device that lets the teachers customise things.
We enjoy having them in the business
"Hopefully the cost of that isn't much more than textbooks have been so that's a big change." He also welcomed the arrival of Apple's iPhone into the market calling it "a great new entrant" "What we are seeing for all these products is that software is increasingly important. If you look at a phone of five years ago it was really about the hardware only.
"But now as you are browsing and managing your calendar and having lots of music or photos, the software is the thing that counts and there are very few companies to do great software." Microsoft produces software which runs on millions of mobile phones and portable devices. He added: "We enjoy having them [Apple] in the business."
|
Still happily running Win2k. And with TClock3, its taskbar can look like Vista's, too (or any other WindowBlinds skin)
http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?s=&showtopic=85819&view=findpost&p=589302
i may have no choice but to buy a new pee-cee, but then again, i should be able to toast the drive and install Linux on there...
Vista's a pile of crap--pure and simple.
The upside is all of the hackers will be concentrating on Vista and will leave my XP alone!
Just posting this for those that happen by .....
Sun Solaris x86 is now free, by the way.
I'm reminded of two other "highly secure" gizmos released recently.
HD-DVD security was cracked in 8 days.
Blu-Ray security was cracked in 1 day.
Just FWIW.
Baghdad Bob was sincere, at least. . .
will have to check it out...
otoh, $$$ isn't something i have a lot of right now (thanks to rising tuition) 8^)
Who watches the watchman? Who protects us from the "I'll delete any program that did not pay tribute to MS, nor bribes to the RIAA, nor graft to Content Lobbyists".
Hey Gates-
Guess what's going on at this very moment on the other desk? I am downloading and installing Debian Linux on another spare machine. I see the router flicking like a Christmas Tree, and Debian pours in at a megabaud, courtesy of a neat website I read about on here this morning.
it's been real.
The more I read about Vista, the more I resolutely urge you to BITE ME. Take your spyware and bribeware and --deleted---.
I have been an MS customer since DOS, and reading about Vista's Dirty Secrets has alienated me beyond any sympathy. One such article is HERE
A SAINT would be furious reading this.
Vista Starter
Do you also like chic flicks, walks in the rain with your partner and shih-tzus?
If you want to proclaim your independence from MS something a little more authoritative would be better.
But you can settle out of court by sending a check for $3,000 to the RIAA, etc.
Or leave cash in a plain brown bag by the pine tree tonight, for *ahem* Administrative Privileges. Wink wink
LOL!
I was thinking the same thing, I have seen XP drag on systems with similar spec to their quotes. Im sure vista will load and start up but hevaen help you if you need to do anything else..
can we see the source code to check it ourselves please?
?? What could possibly be more authoritative than a site offering a free alternative to try?
Has it ocurred to anyone that possibly MS has declared ITS independence from, or contempt for, many of its loyal users?
In a few minutes I will be test driving Debian Linux, to compare it to Red Hat and SuSE on the other "converted" machines.
Three down, five to go.
"I think Dell.... for one....will ship you a new PC without OS and not include the cost of windows,,,,"
Correct, I ordered a nice Dell a few months back, loaded MEPIS (linux) and never looked back. It took all of about 20 minutes to install, most of that time was spent formatting (automatically) the HDD for MEPIS. It found all my hardware and configed it with no problem at all.
I'm running Windoze / MEPIS on this pooter right now using "dual boot" option.
Which means that it is secure from no one. Backdoors have a bad habit of getting found by people who weren't supposed to know that they were there.
I am no Microsoft fan (Gentoo is my system of choice), but I do not think that that is an entirely fair assessment. They have been getting better over time. 95 was better than DoDOS (dark old DOS), 98 was better than 95, and XP was better than 98. The only real hickups have been ME and the upcoming Vista. They have, however, been getting more and more invasive as time goes on. I don't mind entering a key all that much, but I hate anything that requires a phone home to work. I just don't have that level of trust in any company, but especially not Microsoft.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.