1 posted on
01/27/2007 9:06:45 PM PST by
Rembrandt
To: Rembrandt
2 posted on
01/27/2007 9:09:46 PM PST by
NicknamedBob
(Sign says, "No dogs allowed -- except seeing-eye dogs" Why don't they put that sign down lower?)
To: Rembrandt
3 posted on
01/27/2007 9:12:14 PM PST by
RushCrush
(God Bless our fine military! Thank you for your service! We are forever indebted to you!)
To: Rembrandt
Newt as V.P. unstoppable, Newt as nominee means defeat.
Romney-Gingrich The cure for liberalism (please take every 4 years as directed).
4 posted on
01/27/2007 9:14:12 PM PST by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: Rembrandt
Interesting, Rembrandt, I had the same thought recently.
6 posted on
01/27/2007 9:24:50 PM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(Boycott all Leftist Media, ignore them and they will go away...)
To: Rembrandt
I have heard suggestions that he is already working with Giuliani as something of a senior advisor/consultant to help him stake positions on presidential matters. Shame Newt isn't running, I'd rather him over Giuliani any day.
To: Rembrandt
I gather that it is good strategy to have a Republican Vice President that Democrats hate more than the President. An impeachment or assassination of the President, would result in a less popular (with Democrats) President. Agnew and Cheney fit the bill. Democrats got rid of Agnew, and then it was open season on Nixon. Democrats tried to get rid of Cheney but failed. By this reasoning Newt would be a good choice for Vice President.
BTW, I like Newt! I also like Mike Pence. I don't know anything about Romney. I did hear a portion of a talk he gave in Israel about the Muslim terrorist threat. He sounded very good to my ears. I don't know anything about Hunter. Another VP possibility would be John Ashcroft. Newt or Ashcroft as President would drive the liberals wild. Perhaps that is endorsement enough for either the number one or number two spot.
12 posted on
01/27/2007 9:54:36 PM PST by
ChessExpert
(Reagan defeated America's enemies foreign and domestic. I hope Bush can do the same.)
To: Rembrandt
Hillary would never debate a Newt / Giuliani(VP) / or Duncan(VP) matchup..
Would make her look very bad.. not debating..
Gingrich would eat her alive.. with gravitas..
14 posted on
01/27/2007 10:10:25 PM PST by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
To: Rembrandt
The only reason Newt is being ubiquitously featured in the media is because he is endlessly carping at the current administration.
17 posted on
01/27/2007 10:40:51 PM PST by
La Enchiladita
(People get ready . . .)
To: Rembrandt
27 posted on
01/28/2007 1:26:11 AM PST by
tdscpa
To: Rembrandt
With the presidential field the way it is, I almost think we should consider forgiving Jack Kemp for being about the worst
vice presidential campaigner in history.
Kemp is the elder statesman of the party, even more than Newt is. Instrumental in the economic turnaround of the country under Reagan, and actually the leader in the tax rate reduction plank of the Republican Party.
28 posted on
01/28/2007 2:58:37 AM PST by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
To: Rembrandt
"She" ( Hillary ) turned me into a "Newt" (supporter).
Monty Python and The Holy Grail
29 posted on
01/28/2007 5:03:24 AM PST by
Renegade
To: Rembrandt
Newt Gingrich/Ben Stein '08
35 posted on
01/28/2007 5:24:54 PM PST by
Lewite
(Praise YAHWEH and Proclaim His Wonderful Name! Islam, the end time Beast-the harlot of Babylon.)
To: Rembrandt
36 posted on
01/28/2007 5:29:02 PM PST by
BUSHdude2000
(President Bush, STAND UP TO THE LEFT AND PROTECT OUR TROOPS)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson