I don't have to tell you, because you already know, and are now simply talking in circles in a pathetic attempt to claim as you did in post #45 that making a backup of one's own media is "criminal", when you already know for a fact it is not. Funny to watch, since when you were defending the Russian hackers you were calling Apple's letter threatening criminal charges "BS", trotting out the "180 day rule for criminal prosecution", etc. I showed case history of hackers being charged criminally by simply distributing a software crack, despite your insistent lies they had to include the software. So show us case history of someone being charged criminally for making a personal backup of one's own media why don't you? You did claim in post #45 I would accuse someone doing that of being a criminal, when in fact it was obviously just you trying to blur the lines in defense of criminal Russian hackers again.
Yes I do, but I have a consistent view on this, and you don't. Why is one illegal and the other not, when both actions break exactly the same law?
claim as you did in post #45 that making a backup of one's own media is "criminal"
Retract that, because I never claimed so.
Funny to watch, since when you were defending the Russian hackers you were calling Apple's letter threatening criminal charges "BS"
And there have been successful lawsuits against those distributing the tool necessary to backup DVDs, under the same law that was used against Elcomsoft.
trotting out the "180 day rule for criminal prosecution",
That is a different law, unrelated to this discussion. It would have applied if you had been correct that the hackers were distributing OS X itself.
I showed case history of hackers being charged criminally by simply distributing a software crack, despite your insistent lies they had to include the software.
I never claimed so. Two different laws here: one for distributing copyrighted works, one for cracking DRM. The DRM one requires personal financial gain to be criminal, the other one can require just a certain value worth of copyrighted works be distributed.
So show us case history of someone being charged criminally for making a personal backup of one's own media why don't you?
I can't because the DVD CCA and/or MPAA has never gone after it that way. I also don't think it should be criminal. But you can look up Universal v. Reimerdes to see where those distributing the tool to backup DVDs lost in court. Hundreds of people have seen legal action over this tool.
You did claim in post #45 I would accuse someone doing that of being a criminal
No, I said might. In any case, you have been so railing against circumvention of access control measures when I did it, alternately calling them illegal and criminal, that your position on this subject if you were consistent would be that backing up a DVD is illegal, if not criminal.