Well, well. Some “climate expert” on “The Weather Channel” wants to take away AMS certification from those of us who believe the recent “global warming” is a natural process. So much for “tolerance”, huh?...
1 posted on
01/19/2007 9:37:53 AM PST by
syncked
To: syncked
Isn't the weather channel basically an entry level job for those in the weather reporting business? Kinda like McDonald's is for up and coming chefs in 5 star restaurants?
She is just an ideologue starting at the bottom only sprouting what she is told at in the correspondent courses she took.
2 posted on
01/19/2007 9:41:26 AM PST by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: syncked
If you don't believe in the faith you get excommunicated.
3 posted on
01/19/2007 9:41:27 AM PST by
Patrick1
To: syncked
4 posted on
01/19/2007 9:43:17 AM PST by
Captain Rhino
( Dollars spent in India help a friend; dollars spent in China arm an enemy.)
To: syncked
The politicization of the weather continues.
5 posted on
01/19/2007 9:45:45 AM PST by
Brilliant
To: syncked
Damndest thing I ever heard of,
If a weatherman dosnt agree with another weather person thy get de-certified?
What is this excommunication of non-believers in Global Warming?
7 posted on
01/19/2007 9:48:25 AM PST by
sgtbono2002
(Peace through strength.)
To: syncked
Heidi Cullen is the modern-day equivalent of Pope Urban VIII.
11 posted on
01/19/2007 9:55:56 AM PST by
D-Chivas
To: syncked
12 posted on
01/19/2007 9:56:48 AM PST by
pookie18
([Hillary Rotten] Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
To: syncked
Science by consensus is all the rage. Look at evolution verses intelligent design.
It becomes a matter of agreeing with the dogma or getting burned at the stake professionally.
14 posted on
01/19/2007 10:02:09 AM PST by
IrishCatholic
(No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
To: syncked
15 posted on
01/19/2007 10:02:31 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: syncked
Censorship again from the left??? /sarcasm
To: syncked
Liberals are never tolerant of anyone outside their favorite groups and backers.
If we were as blind to ourselves are they are to themselves, we would proclaim how "tolerant" we were of hunters and gun owners. Or of people who wanted "scientists" who believe in global warming, fired.
Or we'd push endlessly for nonprofit organizations -- those whose only claim to fame being that they support us.
Thousands of examples.
Liberals are not tolerant - for the most part, they're petty, closed minded mini-totalitarians.
22 posted on
01/19/2007 10:23:35 AM PST by
GOPJ
(What secret justified Sandy Berger risking jail and ruin?)
To: syncked
Cogitator will be along shortly to drown you in scientific "studies" that support GW; put on your boots.
24 posted on
01/19/2007 10:37:38 AM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Grampa Dave; Interesting Times; Alamo-Girl; ...
27 posted on
01/19/2007 1:50:31 PM PST by
devolve
( ....shop_invest_and_hire_wisely)
To: syncked
If the news wasn't bad enough, I now read this:
"Perhaps the most dangerous threat to future food security is the rise in temperature. Among crop ecologists there is now a consensus that for each temperature rise of 1 degree Celsius above the historical average during the growing season, we can expect a 10 percent decline in grain yields. When describing weather-reduced harvests, crop analysts often refer to the crop prospect when weather returns to normal. They fail to realize that with the earth’s climate now in flux, there is no longer a norm to return to."
http://www.earth-policy.org/Indicators/Grain/2006.htm
29 posted on
01/19/2007 2:02:10 PM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
