Replies

Agreed, Coman sounds like he may be only a minor improvement over Liefong. But I still can't see him taking this outrage to trial.

1 posted on 01/19/2007 8:45:11 AM PST by freespirited

To: abb; Howlin

Dukelax ping

2 posted on 01/19/2007 8:45:40 AM PST by freespirited (Honk for disbarment of Mike Nifong.)

To: freespirited

Coman may be cursing the day Nifong was born.

4 posted on 01/19/2007 8:49:58 AM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)

To: freespirited

"In that one, he was confronted with the fact that [evidence of innocence] was withheld by the previous DA."

. . . and how exactly is that different from what's going on here?

Methinks the defense attorney is firing a warning shot here . . . in a very subtle way.

6 posted on 01/19/2007 8:52:34 AM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))

To: freespirited

He will take the case to trial unless there is a change in venue. Then all bets are off.

10 posted on 01/19/2007 12:56:41 PM PST by OldFriend (THE PRESS IS AN EVIL FOR WHICH THERE IS NO REMEDY)

To: freespirited

Well, since he lost the Gell case, maybe he'll think twice, but I doubt it. I'm not confident about this pair at all.

25 posted on 01/19/2007 1:55:44 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794