Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited
"In that one, he was confronted with the fact that [evidence of innocence] was withheld by the previous DA."

. . . and how exactly is that different from what's going on here?

Methinks the defense attorney is firing a warning shot here . . . in a very subtle way.

6 posted on 01/19/2007 8:52:34 AM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob

Ping.


7 posted on 01/19/2007 12:24:18 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanMother

The difference is that this time the prosecutor's misconduct was discovered BEFORE conviction.

The scary part is that Coman stated in the bar action that he'd have withheld that same evidence, which is unlawful under NC law - not exactly a confidence-builder for his management for this case.

Winstead is a white apologist, I believe. I wish we had some information as to the quality of the relationship she had with Nifong when she worked in the Durham DA's office.


26 posted on 01/19/2007 2:02:08 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson