The two images at the top are zoomed. The red light on the right in the bottom pic is a radio tower light, according to the caption.
I just think that if it were I, I wouldn't pick WND to bring my story to the world.
ML/NJ
There are photos at the link
With the Chicago incident as well, are we seeing the newest generation of terror-fighting weapons???
The two images at the top are zoomed. The red light on the right in the bottom pic is a radio tower light, according to the caption.
Hmmm. Van Buren's too far south of Neosho/Joplin for the spook lights to have gone down there - and he said they were to his southeast, anyway - Fort Chaffee, Fort Smith.
OK, I give up! Too bad he got crazy-sounding there at the end. WND wouldn't know the difference, tho.
There were probably low clouds passing between the camera and the 11 lights that covered and oncovered them in different patterns.
The light looks like an out of focus "smiley" face candy. I guess the Aliens are smiling at us - before they eat us.
THANKS.
Sounds like an impressive case. Will see if a link for the pics shows up.
UFO PING LIST PING.
NOTE: THE LAST UPDATE FILE OF THIS PING LIST IS DATED 10 DEC 2006. If you have notified me after that date and it has not been reflected, SORRY--please notify me again.
Please let Las Vegas Dave and I know if you want on or off the list.
Blessings,
THANKS.
John Lear was insisting on C2C last night that ALL the triangle craft are our own. That we built them with ET help and back engineering efforts etc.
'Not of this world.'
That narrows it down.
ping
Arkansas, again?
Klintoon comes to mind.
Relative to a question on this thread ABOUT fuzzy photos . . . there's this fascinating thread on ABOVETOPSECRET.COM AT:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread133299/pg13
This is also the "blog" that John Lear mentioned on C2C last night. Below is from just one multipage section. There are more than 14 sections.
= = = = =
sleeper
Member
Registered: 25/6/2004
Mood:
Member was on ATS
56 minutes ago.
ATS Points: 16158
BTS Points: 3966
PTS Points: 1971
Ignore this user (info)
ignore
Vote for this user (info)
way above
posted on 10/5/2005 at 07:28 (post id: 1396623) - single - this post
quote: Originally posted by s7e6e
Sleeper, why do you think that all pictures of ufo's are blurred and fuzzy?
Why do you think that all ufo sightings are summary described ?
ETs are slowly making themselves known, eventually they will come out and everyone can take pictures of the neatto flying machines and them----but I’m thinking it will not be for sometime yet.
We have stealth aircraft designed to avoid radar and other forms of detection because we wish to remain incognito during reconnaissance.
The ETs have the ability to mask their ships in infinite ways, including making them very difficult to photograph. They are invisible most of the time and uncloak only when they want certain people to see them-----however, they don’t allow clear photos of their ships because they are not ready to make full contact.
That is why most contactees can only give brief statements of their experiences----nine-five percent of what most experience is blocked from memory------regression only reveals what the aliens allow and most of the time info from regression is only stuff the ETs put there for that purpose-----ETs are not as dumb as some people think.
But ETs will dictate information telepathically like questions asked of them-----seeing is believing, they know this and don’t want much of their stuff described on the front pages of newspapers.
quote: Originally posted by s7e6e
how come you're still here, beeing able to speak rather than dead ?!? Do you actually think that someone believes just because he wants to?
I’m still here because obviously I’m no threat, being slightly entertaining is not going to upset the apple cart of the military or the ETs.
Obviously the ETs want some of this out there, a little at a time otherwise no one would be able to tell their stories.
The military can’t “whack” people like me without permission from the ETs.
quote: Originally posted by s7e6e
Proof is what makes beliefe a constant and not a variable.
I agree one hundred percent------without proof I wouldn’t believe either-----and I believe one hundred percent.
signature
We are not here to change the world---we are here so that the world can change us
member bloguser profilefind postssend u2u copyright
COPYRIGHT IS OWNED BY THE POSTER AND CO-OWNED BY ATS.COM SEE THEIR COPYRIGHT POLICY FOR INFO.
ibid:
sleeper
Member
Registered: 25/6/2004
Mood:
Member was on ATS
56 minutes ago.
ATS Points: 16158
BTS Points: 3966
PTS Points: 1971
Ignore this user (info)
ignore
Vote for this user (info)
way above
posted on 10/5/2005 at 12:12 (post id: 1397084) - single - this post
quote: Originally posted by mbkennel
1) what precisely are they doing here, and why?
2) what is the purpose of their limited, and apparently involuntary, interactions with certain humans?
3) why certain humans, such, as, apparently, yourself?
4) why do they apparently allow marginal independent contact, but do not make full and open diplomatic relations with the population as a whole?
5) Do they believe this is ethical?
6) why haven't they bothered to ask us about it?
1. This planet is in the incubation stages----there are more than one race of ETs here because there are many programs involved----humans share identical DNA because that is a requirement of this planet-----but that doesn’t mean all humans originated from one place, but from hundreds of places in the galaxy.
2. They interact with those they use as vehicles to bring things into this planet, like technology, and higher awareness.
3. I was willing to work cheap.
4. The population as a whole would revolt against an entity from other worlds-----not everyone wants ETs down here telling us what to do. The vast majority is not ready.
5. It is ethical to keep this planet from a mental meltdown, because that’s what would happen if all of a sudden humanity became aware that there are thousands of ET ships on earth, on the moon, in orbit around the planet and throughout the solar system.
6. We wouldn’t understand the question.
quote: Originally posted by mbkennelIf they had the ability to colonize the galaxy why it wouldn't be bursting with obvious EM signs that we would have seen with SETI. {Frankly I would have thought that if major ET civilizations with interstellar travel were possible, then SETI would have given a positive result the very first time it was turned on, as thousands of solar systems would be giving artificial emissions.
Humans have yet to hatch out of this planet yet we believe that we can pick up advanced extraterrestrial communications. Humans are a few hundred years from that kind of ability. SETI is the pioneer, but they hardly have any devices to detect exotic ET stuff.
There are thousands of alien ships buzzing all over the place right here on earth and our technology can’t detect them, yet we point our equipment at places light years away and we expect what?
It wasn’t that long ago that we communicated with smoke signals, and cuneiform tablets. The electromagnetic spectrum is a nice communications vehicle for us today, but it’s not what the big boys in galaxies faraway play with.
signature
We are not here to change the world---we are here so that the world can change us
Lights 'not of this world' mystery finally solved
Flares for A-10 Warthog training.
The story that prompted this thread might've mentioned that the photographed lights just happened to be over the Fort Chaffee bombing range! Sheesh...