Skip to comments.
Air Force colonel reports lights 'not of this world' (More UFOs)
World Net Daily ^
| January 17, 2007
| Joe Kovacs
Posted on 01/17/2007 5:22:39 PM PST by Zechariah_8_13
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Zechariah_8_13
"I believe these lights were not of this world, and I feel a duty and responsibility to come forward," Col. Brian Fields told WND. I just think that if it were I, I wouldn't pick WND to bring my story to the world.
ML/NJ
2
posted on
01/17/2007 5:25:13 PM PST
by
ml/nj
To: Zechariah_8_13
There are photos at the link
3
posted on
01/17/2007 5:26:01 PM PST
by
Zechariah_8_13
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
To: ml/nj
Actually, it's better than Rense or C2C. Who would want to be ridiculed by CNN or other of the alphabet networks?
4
posted on
01/17/2007 5:31:16 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
To: Zechariah_8_13
With the Chicago incident as well, are we seeing the newest generation of terror-fighting weapons???
5
posted on
01/17/2007 5:46:11 PM PST
by
dinoparty
To: dinoparty
With the Chicago incident as well, are we seeing the newest generation of terror-fighting weapons???I suspect the experimentation being done today probably won't bear fruit for many years. By then, hopefully we have gloabl terrorism cleaned up to some extent. Unless we have more Democrat presidents who sweep it under the proverbial rug.
To: somemoreequalthanothers
To: Zechariah_8_13


The two images at the top are zoomed. The red light on the right in the bottom pic is a radio tower light, according to the caption.
To: Zechariah_8_13
Nothing to concern yourself about ... just alien craft making their initial approach for landing at Mena, Arkansas. Mena, Arkansas? Just ask Bubba ... he can fill you in on the details.
9
posted on
01/17/2007 6:15:47 PM PST
by
BluH2o
To: Zechariah_8_13
I found this photo at John Batchalors site. Not of any UFO, but still really cool.
10
posted on
01/17/2007 6:17:50 PM PST
by
mware
(By all that you hold dear... on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
To: Zechariah_8_13
Hmmm. Van Buren's too far south of Neosho/Joplin for the spook lights to have gone down there - and he said they were to his southeast, anyway - Fort Chaffee, Fort Smith.
OK, I give up! Too bad he got crazy-sounding there at the end. WND wouldn't know the difference, tho.
11
posted on
01/17/2007 6:40:22 PM PST
by
Rte66
To: snarks_when_bored
Why is it that people who photograph UFOs can't ever seem to focus a camera? All I see are several SEVERELY out of focus lights.
12
posted on
01/17/2007 6:54:59 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
Good question. I don't know what we can conclude from such photos...nothing much, it would seem
To: FreedomCalls
"Why is it that people who photograph UFOs can't ever seem to focus a camera?" Because they are tripping on mushrooms when they click.
14
posted on
01/17/2007 7:15:35 PM PST
by
TBall
To: FreedomCalls
Why is it that people who photograph UFOs can't ever seem to focus a camera?
Because the aliens are in the middle of decloaking and thus the ship is never fully visible much less in focus.
15
posted on
01/17/2007 8:02:47 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: snarks_when_bored; TBall; festus; Zechariah_8_13

Crank up the brightness and contrast and you will find that there are 11 badly out-of-focus lights in that picture. None differ significantly from the admitted radio tower lights on the right. It's garbage.
16
posted on
01/17/2007 8:21:49 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
My goodness. There's more of em than we first thought!!!
Maude get me my gun and if I'm not back in 20 minutes call the sherrif...............
17
posted on
01/17/2007 8:24:25 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: FreedomCalls
Good job. I'd also like to see a daylight photo of that same area from the same position.
To: FreedomCalls
actually it may be that they are so small on a normal lens that they are just zoomed to the point where they look like that. (I can only assume he had the camera set to infinity.)
To: WoofDog123
actually it may be that they are so small on a normal lens that they are just zoomed to the point where they look like that. (I can only assume he had the camera set to infinity.) No, it's the focus that's off. If you zoom in on a point source (like a distant light), you will still have a point source. If you defocus a point source (even one located at infinity), you will have the blobs just like in the picture.
20
posted on
01/17/2007 10:28:33 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson