Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force colonel reports lights 'not of this world' (More UFOs)
World Net Daily ^ | January 17, 2007 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 01/17/2007 5:22:39 PM PST by Zechariah_8_13

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2007 5:22:41 PM PST by Zechariah_8_13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zechariah_8_13
"I believe these lights were not of this world, and I feel a duty and responsibility to come forward," Col. Brian Fields told WND.

I just think that if it were I, I wouldn't pick WND to bring my story to the world.

ML/NJ

2 posted on 01/17/2007 5:25:13 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah_8_13

There are photos at the link


3 posted on 01/17/2007 5:26:01 PM PST by Zechariah_8_13 (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Actually, it's better than Rense or C2C. Who would want to be ridiculed by CNN or other of the alphabet networks?


4 posted on 01/17/2007 5:31:16 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah_8_13

With the Chicago incident as well, are we seeing the newest generation of terror-fighting weapons???


5 posted on 01/17/2007 5:46:11 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
With the Chicago incident as well, are we seeing the newest generation of terror-fighting weapons???

I suspect the experimentation being done today probably won't bear fruit for many years. By then, hopefully we have gloabl terrorism cleaned up to some extent. Unless we have more Democrat presidents who sweep it under the proverbial rug.

6 posted on 01/17/2007 5:51:07 PM PST by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers

global, that is


7 posted on 01/17/2007 5:51:49 PM PST by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah_8_13
  

The two images at the top are zoomed. The red light on the right in the bottom pic is a radio tower light, according to the caption.

8 posted on 01/17/2007 6:01:28 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah_8_13
Nothing to concern yourself about ... just alien craft making their initial approach for landing at Mena, Arkansas. Mena, Arkansas? Just ask Bubba ... he can fill you in on the details.
9 posted on 01/17/2007 6:15:47 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah_8_13
I found this photo at John Batchalors site. Not of any UFO, but still really cool.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

10 posted on 01/17/2007 6:17:50 PM PST by mware (By all that you hold dear... on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah_8_13

Hmmm. Van Buren's too far south of Neosho/Joplin for the spook lights to have gone down there - and he said they were to his southeast, anyway - Fort Chaffee, Fort Smith.

OK, I give up! Too bad he got crazy-sounding there at the end. WND wouldn't know the difference, tho.


11 posted on 01/17/2007 6:40:22 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Why is it that people who photograph UFOs can't ever seem to focus a camera? All I see are several SEVERELY out of focus lights.


12 posted on 01/17/2007 6:54:59 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Good question. I don't know what we can conclude from such photos...nothing much, it would seem


13 posted on 01/17/2007 7:10:32 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

"Why is it that people who photograph UFOs can't ever seem to focus a camera?" Because they are tripping on mushrooms when they click.


14 posted on 01/17/2007 7:15:35 PM PST by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Why is it that people who photograph UFOs can't ever seem to focus a camera?

Because the aliens are in the middle of decloaking and thus the ship is never fully visible much less in focus.
15 posted on 01/17/2007 8:02:47 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored; TBall; festus; Zechariah_8_13

Crank up the brightness and contrast and you will find that there are 11 badly out-of-focus lights in that picture. None differ significantly from the admitted radio tower lights on the right. It's garbage.

16 posted on 01/17/2007 8:21:49 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

My goodness. There's more of em than we first thought!!!

Maude get me my gun and if I'm not back in 20 minutes call the sherrif...............


17 posted on 01/17/2007 8:24:25 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Good job. I'd also like to see a daylight photo of that same area from the same position.


18 posted on 01/17/2007 8:40:32 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

actually it may be that they are so small on a normal lens that they are just zoomed to the point where they look like that. (I can only assume he had the camera set to infinity.)


19 posted on 01/17/2007 10:21:06 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
actually it may be that they are so small on a normal lens that they are just zoomed to the point where they look like that. (I can only assume he had the camera set to infinity.)

No, it's the focus that's off. If you zoom in on a point source (like a distant light), you will still have a point source. If you defocus a point source (even one located at infinity), you will have the blobs just like in the picture.

20 posted on 01/17/2007 10:28:33 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson