Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: isthisnickcool
"No taxpayer money should ever be used for sports stadiums."

I find that to be so short sighted. Why shouldn't cities be allowed to compete with one another for a sports franchise. The winners here are the cities who generate enormous tax revenue as well as less tangible benefits. Why do you think the cities all want a franchise? I find the idea to be a no brainer. If you consider the city an entity or business and the residents the owners I want to do everything in my power to find good long term investments to help the city prosper. Sorry but not every investment turns out golden so you can find a few sad stories, half of them involving the Raiders. Here is actually a way to spend tax dollars in a manner that generates income and wealth for a city and you say no?
9 posted on 01/11/2007 11:01:35 AM PST by Bogeygolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Bogeygolfer
...........so you can find a few sad stories, half of them involving the Raiders.

I challenge you to come up with even one success story, with proof that a new sports team was a net profit for a city/county, when the city/county paid for the facilities.

11 posted on 01/11/2007 11:10:46 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Bogeygolfer; jimtorr
Sports stadiums do not return money to the taxpayer. They make money for sports franshice owners that are already wealthy. The exception to that is George W. Bush who got rich off the Texas Stadium deal.

Here is just one study on this matter.

You cannot provide any real data that says that the taxpayer gets anything back on their investment. Heck, in most cities the majority of taxpayers never even see the inside of the stadium.

13 posted on 01/11/2007 12:37:31 PM PST by isthisnickcool (If you can't light a fire in the vacuum of space what's the deal with the Sun?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Bogeygolfer
--I find the idea to be a no brainer. If you consider the city an entity or business and the residents the owners--

--next "city" live in I'll try and cash out my ownership position and take it with me---

17 posted on 01/11/2007 2:02:42 PM PST by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Bogeygolfer
Bingo! You are right. That is why Washington D.C. attracted Montreal Expos to move to the Nation's Capital by building a new stadium. I would say this is similiar to New York City having Central Park, residents of a major city needs to have parks, stadiums, restaurants, etc to prevent them from moving to the Suburbs which would cause a great loss in tax base for the city.

So building a sports stadium is a great investment.

18 posted on 01/11/2007 2:09:17 PM PST by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson