1 posted on
01/08/2007 2:16:09 PM PST by
Sopater
To: DaveLoneRanger
2 posted on
01/08/2007 2:24:22 PM PST by
Sopater
(Creatio Ex Nihilo)
To: Sopater
I took a look at your article (I note that it is prominently linked over at
www.antievolution.org, under the "Anti-Science News" section.
I see nothing in these DNA results which either supports creationism, or which disproves evolution. Perhaps you could clarify these findings for me?
4 posted on
01/08/2007 2:41:03 PM PST by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Sopater
Hmmmm confusing a data segment with a code segment? Could "junk segments" be the pattern loads for what we call "instinct?"
7 posted on
01/08/2007 3:11:40 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Saddam is Dead! Bush's Fault. [Pray for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub.])
To: Sopater
8 posted on
01/08/2007 3:42:54 PM PST by
gobucks
(Blissful Marriage: A result of a worldly husband's transformation into the Word's wife.)
To: Sopater
I was just thinking about this subject along similar lines. Science no longer supports that all could have happened by known natural causes.
13 posted on
01/11/2007 5:22:48 AM PST by
Tribune7
(Conservatives hold bad behavior against their leaders. Dims don't.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson