[Coyoteman]

I took a look at your article (I note that it is prominently linked over at www.antievolution.org, under the "Anti-Science News" section.

I see nothing in these DNA results which either supports creationism, or which disproves evolution. Perhaps you could clarify these findings for me?

[Sopater]

I see nothing in these DNA results which either supports creationism, or which disproves evolution. Perhaps you could clarify these findings for me?

Non-coding DNA having a useful purpose, rather than being evolutional byproducts, supports Creationism.

Since Evolution does not have a well established and rooted "goal-post", I'm skeptical that it possible to "disprove".

Thanks for the link to "antievolution.org". I'll check it out.