[SoCal Pubbie]

By your rationale the example, which you cited, of a blocked punt, would be a touchback for the kicking team, yet it is not. Arguing that the guy blocking the punt has no "impetus" on the football, by your reasoning, is disingenuous. He clearly is forcing the ball, by his action, toward the goal line.

The issue here, as in the play this past weekend, is that possession has not been transfered from the offense to the defense. It is clearly an analogous situation. There cannot be a touchback when the defense has no possession of the ball. Despite the action of the defender, no transfer of possession has been established, hence it is a safety.

[ml/nj]

By your rationale the example, which you cited, of a blocked punt, would be a touchback for the kicking team, yet it is not.

You wear me out. I said the punter arguably is the one providing the impetus, and just in case anyone is confused the rules make it clear that he is to be considered the one providing the impetus. I never suggested that a blocked punt should result in a touchback.

Go take an English class. I'm done with you.

ML/NJ