So you think. And maybe that's the problem.
ML/NJ
Cute.
What exactly is your point? If it's that the ruling was wrong, as in your initial post, I and a host of other posters have shown that a safety was the right call. I sense you've moved past that, and now you're arguing the rule was unjust. That may be your opinion, but it has no bearing on the matter of how the ruling should have gone forward.