Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke Lacrosse Accuser Gives Birth
WRAL ^ | 1/04/07

Posted on 01/04/2007 8:11:42 AM PST by maggief

Chapel Hill — WRAL has confirmed that the accuser in the Duke lacrosse case gave birth at UNC Hospitals on Wednesday.

Sources tell WRAL the woman had the baby by Cesarean section. She was not due until February.

(Excerpt) Read more at wral.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 501-507 next last
To: OldFriend
More like a New Black Panther is the father.

"I am your father, Duke..."

81 posted on 01/04/2007 9:53:55 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Any word on whether the baby was drug tested?


82 posted on 01/04/2007 9:55:10 AM PST by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

I am looking beyond the case, I still believe the boys were set up from the minute they place their phone request for white or hispanic strippers.


83 posted on 01/04/2007 9:55:54 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: writmeister

No word, and not likely we will know.


84 posted on 01/04/2007 9:56:59 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

I was just being a wise guy about the DNA & the Maury Povich thing. ;)

I do doubt that she even knows who the father is though. We all know who it is NOT.


85 posted on 01/04/2007 9:57:08 AM PST by Sue Perkick (Just a water spider on the pond of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Well it's possible but I think the girl hired to put the hit on them would have ensured that some actual sex took place so that the case didn't go down in flames as it's now doing.


86 posted on 01/04/2007 9:57:34 AM PST by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Were Kim and Crystal hired from the same agency?


87 posted on 01/04/2007 9:57:39 AM PST by Carolinamom (Thank God that Mary and Joseph were not pro-choicers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Ya' think Cy headed over to UNC after the swearing in? ;)


88 posted on 01/04/2007 9:58:16 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

Maybe she'll name the kid "Duke" anyway.


89 posted on 01/04/2007 9:58:40 AM PST by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath
Nifong's daughter from a previous marrigage was not at his wearing in. Does anyone know where she lives?

I'm curious as to the wording of the oath of office that he took. Did he swear to uphold the laws of NC and all that they entail? If so, he lied again.

90 posted on 01/04/2007 10:01:32 AM PST by Carolinamom (Thank God that Mary and Joseph were not pro-choicers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: writmeister

Premature birth indicative of poor health habits in the case of this whore.


91 posted on 01/04/2007 10:01:48 AM PST by OldFriend (THE PRESS IS AN EVIL FOR WHICH THERE IS NO REMEDY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Again let me remind everyone that the last time this birth was reported the report was wrong.


92 posted on 01/04/2007 10:01:50 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

wearing in = swearing in....LOL


93 posted on 01/04/2007 10:02:07 AM PST by Carolinamom (Thank God that Mary and Joseph were not pro-choicers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom; Howlin

i just know you two are hosting the baby shower... ; )


94 posted on 01/04/2007 10:05:20 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

Several articles state that she lives in Charlotte.


95 posted on 01/04/2007 10:05:55 AM PST by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: JLS

True. We heard December 13 (sure that was just a coincidence) then February. Now they say yesterday. And the MSM reported all of them.


96 posted on 01/04/2007 10:06:24 AM PST by Sue Perkick (Just a water spider on the pond of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Your invitation is in the mail; no excuses now.


97 posted on 01/04/2007 10:06:50 AM PST by Howlin (Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: maggief; Jezebelle

And look what I just posted at the end of the old thread in response to Jezebelle posting the law:

Well it looks to me like Nifong:

(1) clearly guilty of a mental incapacity which is likely to be permanent but is undiagnosed.

(2) guilty of willful misconduct in office as he willfully used this case to win election, willfully refused to look at exculpatory evidence as required, willfully hid exculpatory evidence and as the NC Bar has said willfully broke other cannons of ethics by willfully talking about this case.

(3) guilty of willful and persistent failure to perform his duties by willfully failing to turn over exculpatory evidence.

(6) guilty of conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute certainly the NC Bar charges fit here again, not recusing himself ater the NC DAs asked him to and the Nifong refusing to hear exculpatory evidence.

The law seems to indicate if anyone makes a sworn affidavit with the clerk of the superior court of the county where the district attorney resides, ie Durham, charging Nifong with (2), (3) or (6).

For example Brodhead could turn himself into a bit of hero here, if he went down to the clerk of the superior court today and files such a sworn affidavit. It is almost hard to believe someone has not done this yet, particularly the evidence is overwhelming in editorials around the state of NC and the nation that Nifong conduct prejudicial to the administration of justic which brings the office into disrepute.



98 posted on 01/04/2007 10:07:24 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom; Protect the Bill of Rights

No, Kim worked for Allure, the agency the boys called.

Allure called Angel's, Precious' agency, IIRC.


99 posted on 01/04/2007 10:08:47 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Ted seems off his gourd.

I keep thinking he's indebted to the black community in Durham in some way; what else explains those blinders he's wearing.


100 posted on 01/04/2007 10:08:54 AM PST by Howlin (Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 501-507 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson