The few times I get to catch him on the radio, I've always appreciated how he deals with the liberals -- not like Sean,who cuts them off suggesting (probably correctly) that he can't answer their points so he has to stop them from talking).
Medved will let the liberals fully explain themselves, and then demolish their arguments, leaving them with nothing to say. It's how debate should really take place.
I didn't see Medved's piece as being particularly histrionic, unlike Corsi here.