Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Straights need not apply [Gay only Condos in MA]
Boston Herald ^ | Sunday, December 17, 2006 | Scott Van Voorhis

Posted on 12/17/2006 9:45:28 AM PST by PajamaTruthMafia

The Bay State, the birthplace of gay marriage, is on the cusp of another revolution in alternative living that could prove to be just as controversial - gay condo communities.

Developers across the country are drawing up plans for condo projects - and sometimes even whole communities - targeted at gay and lesbian buyers. And Massachusetts is proving to be a fertile laboratory for this experiment.

Two planned developments on either end of the state, the Stonewall at Audubon Circle in the Fenway and Paradise One in Easthampton, are pioneering condo complexes marketed to older gay and lesbian residents.

There is talk that a few developers might even move beyond the graying gay population to roll out condo projects aimed at gays of all ages.

But some critics, like state Rep. Brian Wallace (D-South Boston), are fuming over what they see as a new double standard.

“We try and get people in Southie into these (elderly) condos and we get croaked,” Wallace said. “They won’t just let us do South Boston residents.”

“You can do this for one group, and not another?” asked an incredulous Wallace. “It’s pushing the envelope to a drastic point.”

Wallace said Southie has tried time and again to win City Hall’s blessing to build housing targeted at neighborhood seniors, only to be lectured by city development officials about how it would run afoul of fair housing laws. He is threatening to take up the issue with city officials over what he calls a “double standard.”

Boosters of gay condo developments say they have no plans to heap on straights the kind of discrimation they’ve suffered over the years. But it’s unclear how welcoming heterosexual singles and couples would find these communities.

“What if I was saying this building is just for heterosexual people, or Muslims, or Jews or Catholics. What’s the difference?,” asked Michael Carucci, head of ERA Boston Real Estate Group. “To take it the next step and say this building is just for gay people - it’s a bit much,” he said.

Joy Malchodi, who hopes to buy a condo at the Fenway’s proposed Stonewall at Audubon Circle, acknowledged that living in a like-minded community is a major attraction for her. The 58-year-old Fort Point resident recalls days when most gays and lesbians stayed in the closet.

“You would really know your neighbors,” Malchodi said. “The boys would have wonderful dinner parties and I would have plenty of women to go golfing with.”

About 23 other people have put down $1,000 deposits for one of roughly 60 units in the proposed Fenway development

Designed, but not limited to, older gays and lesbians, perks include a dining hall and concierge service. Units will sell from $400,000 to $700,000.

The initial plan for Stonewall called for a condominium co-op. That would have given residents the power to reject would-be buyers, though not on sexual orientation, which would run afoul of anti-discrimination laws.

But while the new project’s condo board will not have such power, residents will have to want to pay for extra services that include a course on “gay grandparents.”Meanwhile, developers are pushing forward with plans for more projects targeted at gays. The Bay State, the birthplace of gay marriage, is on the cusp of another revolution in alternative living that could prove to be just as controversial - gay condo communities David Aronstein, whose Stonewall Communities is marketing the Fenway complex, is exploring the possibility of condo projects for aging gays and lesbians in Boston’s suburbs, as well as in other New England cities such as Providence.

Now some developers - including at least one local builder - are exploring what could be a controversial next step: A condo complex catering to gays of all ages.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: discrimination; gayagenda; gayghettos; gaystate; homosexualagenda; ma; massassachusetts; perverts; whoverifiesgayness; yabbadabbadootime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last
To: null and void

Protein Palisades...


81 posted on 12/17/2006 10:19:09 AM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
"You would really know your neighbors,” Malchodi said. “The boys would have wonderful dinner parties and I would have plenty of women to go golfing with.”

Ugh. How stereotypical can you get? I don't get how gays are allowed to play up their stereotypes, but if I dare say that a gay man might cook well its a civil-court-worthy offense.
82 posted on 12/17/2006 10:19:56 AM PST by Shion (Bring Back John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

Masshole Acres

GayState Gardens


83 posted on 12/17/2006 10:20:00 AM PST by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; nmh
Gin in your cornflakes: Not a good idea.

OTOH, Gin in raisin bran...

84 posted on 12/17/2006 10:20:14 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

AIDS Glades


85 posted on 12/17/2006 10:21:05 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Teehehehee.....


86 posted on 12/17/2006 10:22:25 AM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

Ball Court


87 posted on 12/17/2006 10:22:44 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Abomination Avenue...


88 posted on 12/17/2006 10:23:38 AM PST by JRochelle (Duncan Hunter 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Poopushers Pavillions...


89 posted on 12/17/2006 10:24:07 AM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

Mt. Oil-in-puss


90 posted on 12/17/2006 10:25:12 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady

These folks don't discriminate on the basis of sex. Men and women are both alllowed to live there, just not with one another. All gay housing is legal under federal (not necessarily state) law.


91 posted on 12/17/2006 10:27:43 AM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
Federal laws say you cannot discriminate against home buyers based on race, religion, sex, and this is certainly discrimination.

As with the Constitution, laws are living and breathing to a liberal.

Pick and choose politics.

92 posted on 12/17/2006 10:29:42 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Villa De Strapon...


93 posted on 12/17/2006 10:30:03 AM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia; Lil'freeper
Fudgepacker Pointe
94 posted on 12/17/2006 10:30:29 AM PST by big'ol_freeper (It looks like one of those days when one nuke is just not enough-- Lt. Col. Mitchell, SG-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

How about some street names?

Tailgunner drive

Tea Bag Lane

Fisting Street

Felching Place

Cunnilingus Corner

Anal Avenue

Touching Bush Way

Butch Place

Fem Drive

Pitchers Place

Catchers Corner

If you're lucky you can live in a cum-de-sac


95 posted on 12/17/2006 10:30:51 AM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

Excellent!


96 posted on 12/17/2006 10:31:54 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

Lick Lane


97 posted on 12/17/2006 10:32:31 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

Bush Gardens


98 posted on 12/17/2006 10:32:36 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
Hemorrhoid Boulevard...
99 posted on 12/17/2006 10:33:36 AM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Three Finger Drive


100 posted on 12/17/2006 10:33:56 AM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson