Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soy is making kids 'gay'
WorldNetDaily ^ | 12/12/06 | Jim Rutz

Posted on 12/13/2006 10:38:31 AM PST by Sonora

There's a slow poison out there that's severely damaging our children and threatening to tear apart our culture. The ironic part is, it's a "health food," one of our most popular. Now, I'm a health-food guy, a fanatic who seldom allows anything into his kitchen unless it's organic. I state my bias here just so you'll know I'm not anti-health food.

The dangerous food I'm speaking of is soy. Soybean products are feminizing, and they're all over the place. You can hardly escape them anymore.

I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.

Estrogens are female hormones. If you're a woman, you're flooding your system with a substance it can't handle in surplus. If you're a man, you're suppressing your masculinity and stimulating your "female side," physically and mentally.

In fetal development, the default is being female. All humans (even in old age) tend toward femininity. The main thing that keeps men from diverging into the female pattern is testosterone, and testosterone is suppressed by an excess of estrogen.

If you're a grownup, you're already developed, and you're able to fight off some of the damaging effects of soy. Babies aren't so fortunate. Research is now showing that when you feed your baby soy formula, you're giving him or her the equivalent of five birth control pills a day. A baby's endocrine system just can't cope with that kind of massive assault, so some damage is inevitable. At the extreme, the damage can be fatal.

Snip.......


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: artificialfoodstuff; cuespookymusic; dietfad; doomed; ickywickywoo; myth; processedfood; soy; soybean; urbanlegend; urbanmyth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: Red Badger

LOL!!


21 posted on 12/13/2006 10:52:59 AM PST by Millee (Tagline free since 10/20/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sonora

Just the latest example of WingNutDaily embarrasing itself. It's the one news source where I actually feel dumber after reading it.


22 posted on 12/13/2006 10:53:05 AM PST by gdani (Save the cheerleader, save the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonora

There is research that processed soy leads to mental degeneration.

That wouldn't correspond to moral degeneration but is certainly more credible than claiming that someone is a crossdresser by getting the "wear the member of the opposite sex's clothes" gene. We are born naked. Clothes are fashion dictated by culture.


23 posted on 12/13/2006 10:53:37 AM PST by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonora

Hmmmmm....eating too much soy can lead to homosexuality?Author,"All humans(even in old age)tend toward femininity."Say what????I ck out the articles on WND from time to time,most are well written,but every once in a while....


24 posted on 12/13/2006 10:54:44 AM PST by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
Soybean products are feminizing, and they're all over the place

I guess the Soy & Rice based diet neatly explains the Japanese actions of WWII then. It was nothing more that diet induced PMS!!!

25 posted on 12/13/2006 10:54:50 AM PST by kAcknor (Don't flatter yourself.... It is a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-
In fact, I am more than happy with my new breasts.

You don't get half as much done in a day as you used, too, I bet.

26 posted on 12/13/2006 10:55:03 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
Does this article represent the general conservative view?

Evidently you're one of those people who think science is a political tool rather than a discipline based upon empirical observation. You probably also believe that we know everything about global climate and can control it by changing human behavior.

The empirical fact is that soy contains estrogen analogs..

http://www.mothering.com/articles/growing_child/food/soy_story.html

Male infants experience a testosterone surge during the first few months of life and produce androgens in amounts equal to those of adult men. So much testosterone at such a tender age is needed to program the body for puberty, the time when a male's sex organs should develop and he should begin to express male characteristics such as facial and pubic hair and a deep voice. If receptor sites intended for the hormone testosterone are occupied by soy estrogens, however, appropriate development may never take place.71-74 To date, most of the evidence damning soy formula can be found only in animal studies, because investigations in which humans' sex hormone levels are lowered experimentally cannot ethically be done. However, in the years since soy formula has been in the marketplace, parents and pediatricians have reported growing numbers of boys whose physical maturation is either delayed or does not occur at all. Breasts, underdeveloped gonads, undescended testicles (cryptorchidism), and steroid insufficiencies are increasingly common. Sperm counts are also falling.75-79

Soy formula is bad news for girls as well. Natural estrogen levels approximately double during the first month of life, then decline and remain at low levels until puberty. With increased estrogens in the environment in the diet, an alarming number of girls are entering puberty much earlier than normal.80-82 One percent of girls now show signs of puberty, such as breast development or pubic hair, before the age of three. By the age of eight, 14.7 percent of Caucasian girls and 48.3 percent of African American girls had one or both of these characteristics.83 The fact that blacks experience earlier puberties than whites is not a racial difference but a recent phenomenon.84, 85

27 posted on 12/13/2006 10:55:27 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Are our prisons filled with latent homosexuals or do people decide that they can engage in a certain sex act when they become desperate?


28 posted on 12/13/2006 10:55:55 AM PST by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: weegee

"Clothes are fashion dictated by culture."

Tell it to Brittany Spears. ;-)


29 posted on 12/13/2006 10:55:57 AM PST by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

More info: Soy isoflavones are phyto-endocrine disrupters. At dietary levels, they can prevent ovulation and stimulate the growth of cancer cells. Eating as little as 30 grams (about 4 tablespoons) of soy per day can result in hypothyroidism with symptoms of lethargy, constipation, weight gain and fatigue.


30 posted on 12/13/2006 10:56:14 AM PST by 3AngelaD (ic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

the article is indeed kind of poorly written but a google search turned up an interesting article:

http://www.mothering.com/articles/growing_child/food/soy_story.html

which concludes with:
"The bottom line is that the safety of soy foods has yet to be proven, and that human beings have become guinea pigs in what Daniel M. Sheehan, formerly senior toxicologist with the FDA's National Center for Toxicological Research, has called a "large, uncontrolled and basically unmonitored human experiment."

Environmental scientists are worried about low levels of estrogenic compounds in water -- giving soy to a baby may be a far worse threat....


31 posted on 12/13/2006 10:56:27 AM PST by Tirian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dashing doofus

All this talk of war, it's no surprise that she went commando. Besides, think of it like a micro-thong. Maybe she really was wearing dental floss.


32 posted on 12/13/2006 10:57:07 AM PST by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TeenagedConservative
Besides, homosexuality would have to pass on the gene if it were a gene, and gays don't reproduce.

You'd better tell Mary Cheney, who has a bun in the oven, and Pastor Ted Haggard, who has five children. You also need to brush up on your knowledge of genetics, since just because something is present from birth, that doesn't necessarily mean it was passed along through genes.
33 posted on 12/13/2006 10:57:21 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Great tagline!


34 posted on 12/13/2006 10:58:21 AM PST by RockinRight (Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. He's a Socialist. And unqualified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tirian

Have to wonder what effect it has on precocious puberty. Sex positive proponents are telling us that we must accept younger sexual activity because girls are "maturing" at younger ages (far below 10).


35 posted on 12/13/2006 10:58:50 AM PST by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy

What do those people have to do with anything? I know that gay people exist. I also know that some are not "100%" gay.


36 posted on 12/13/2006 11:01:53 AM PST by TeenagedConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
Absolute. Complete. Utter. Total. Bravo-Sierra. An embarassment to conservatives.

It boggles the mind: If this article containted even a grainule of truth, then the entireity of China would be up to its eyeballs in rainbow flags and bad techno.

37 posted on 12/13/2006 11:02:52 AM PST by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I know you're making a point, but I can't quite lay a hand on it.


38 posted on 12/13/2006 11:03:35 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
Does this article represent the general conservative view?

Conservatives, IMHO, should support information based on sound science. This article isn't based on science, much less sound science. Conservatives should absolutely be embarrassed by this publication since this kind of looney tunes is normally reserved for those moonbats on the left.

39 posted on 12/13/2006 11:05:13 AM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonora

40 posted on 12/13/2006 11:06:27 AM PST by Perdogg (I'm Perdogg and I approved this message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson