Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mel Gibson's "Apocalypto" - It's No Bloody Good
Crosswalk ^ | Dec 8th, 2006 | Christian Hamaker

Posted on 12/08/2006 9:26:29 AM PST by TaraP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Zack Nguyen
Just got back.

Already planning to go twice again next week.

21 posted on 12/08/2006 8:10:22 PM PST by Dajjal (See my FR homepage for new essay about Ahmadinejad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal

Wow - what did you like about it? Can you give us your thoughts?


22 posted on 12/08/2006 8:39:29 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

I just saw it today - stunning. It is the movie of the year. It is non-politically correct because it destroys the leftist myth of the "Noble Savage" who is destroyed by the evil white Spanish Catholics - the truth is that the Mayans were just savages and the Spanish saved them from themselves and their evil witch doctors. The movie "Conquest of Paradise" shows the leftist view of western civilization destroying the Indian New World - Mel's movie shows the Spanish coming with a cross to destroy the hellish world that the Indians created for themselves and to bring them a better future. Excellent.


23 posted on 12/08/2006 9:03:20 PM PST by Howard Jarvis Admirer (Howard Jarvis, the foe of the tax collector and friend of the California homeowner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howard Jarvis Admirer

Very interesting. Thank you!


24 posted on 12/08/2006 9:48:22 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Wow - what did you like about it? Can you give us your thoughts?

A friend of mine advised me to avoid all reviews before seeing it, and I'm glad I followed his advice. But if you're here, it's probably too late for that for you. LOL! I won't give any plot spoilers, but I was amazed by the story itself. Even apart from the big-picture "meaning" of the film, Gibson is just a good storyteller about these characters. And the cast of unknown actors were fantastic. There is complete conviction and believability in every character. Dean Semler did the cinematography -- he did the filming of all three "Mad Max" movies, and was the perfect choice for this film. Having the dialogue completely in Mayan was genius. Kudos to everyone involved with the costuming and special effects.

25 posted on 12/08/2006 10:14:05 PM PST by Dajjal (See my FR homepage for new essay about Ahmadinejad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TaraP; Hugin; Cyclopean Squid; The Old Hoosier; Dajjal; Howard Jarvis Admirer
The guy has made some great movies.
I'll probably see it, too.
I hope it does well,
if only to pi$$ off the rest of Hollywood.

And even though I was disappointed in him in his drunken rant,
rules are rules...



He proved he wasn't perfect, but he sure looked the part.
26 posted on 12/09/2006 4:34:52 AM PST by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclopean Squid

I saw the movie last night.

I believe that Mel was trying to show the audience that the native culture was terrible, bloody, savage, etc.

That the "invasion" of the Spanish Catholics was an improvement.

The audience applauded after this terribly bloody movie. That's California, I guess.


27 posted on 12/09/2006 7:04:41 AM PST by Loud Mime (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howard Jarvis Admirer

We had the same observations about the movie...

I kept wondering why it was so bloody; it was worse than "Saving Private Ryan." At the end I understood, and agree with you.


28 posted on 12/09/2006 7:07:54 AM PST by Loud Mime (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Fantastic film on so many levels. Too bad the reviewer is caught up in ugly ignorance.

This film is a masterpiece!


29 posted on 12/09/2006 4:20:55 PM PST by eleni121 ( + En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weep-o-crat Hunter

Don't worry. Pres. Reagan came from Hollywood's Golden Age. this Italian psychopath came during Commieweird's septic age. The movie was about 2-3 years ago.

HE would be very disappointed at the quality of movies today. The graves of actors, actresses, and directors of the Golden age have been turned into electrical generators, if you catch my drift.


30 posted on 12/10/2006 6:04:24 PM PST by Killborn (Age of servitude. A government of the traitors, by the liars, for the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

I saw a deep Christian message throughout the movie, which this reviewer apparently missed. I can understand how the bloody violence in the story would distract away from the underlying Christian theme, though.


31 posted on 12/12/2006 7:15:49 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson