To: threeleftsmakearight
Why not nominate a woman this time? It might make it harder for the Dems to filibuster her nomination.
16 posted on
12/04/2006 9:29:43 AM PST by
Ciexyz
(Satisfied owner of a 2007 Toyota Corolla.)
To: Ciexyz
You mean like all the female judges they filibustered? Or the way they debase Condi? You don't understand the Dem's playbook...it's only Dem females that are untouchable. GOP women aren't monsters by nature, therefore attackable.
To: Ciexyz
And let that woman be Ann Coulter.
93 posted on
12/04/2006 9:46:45 AM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
( Is not death also victory in a war against an abomination so vile you could never live with it?)
To: Ciexyz
Why not nominate a woman this time? It might make it harder for the Dems to filibuster her nomination. The Democrats would only have to filibuster the nomination for a couple of days. After the 110th Congress comes in they can simply table a nomination (or vote it down if they really want).
126 posted on
12/04/2006 10:25:06 AM PST by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Ciexyz
Why not nominate a woman this time? It might make it harder for the Dems to filibuster her nomination.Dolly Parton? Clinton (Bill) would certainly be the first to offer his support....with him on board, she couldn't lose.
143 posted on
12/04/2006 10:41:56 AM PST by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
To: Ciexyz
Why not nominate a woman this time? It might make it harder for the Dems to filibuster her nomination.How about Elizabeth Dole?
199 posted on
12/04/2006 12:02:14 PM PST by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: Ciexyz
Why not nominate a woman this time? It might make it harder for the Dems to filibuster her nomination.
I suggest Condi. As you may know, she is both Black and a Womyn so we would score 2 on our affirmative action scorecard.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson