[Theo]

I have said on several occasions that the child is innocent, and not at fault. Stone Mountain seems unable to understand that. Generally people on FR understand simple statements like, "The child is innocent." My conclusion was that Stone Mountain is not of sound mind, and therefore a DUer.

Forget it. This discussion is not worth my time.

[carlr]

I have said on several occasions that the child is innocent, and not at fault. Stone Mountain seems unable to understand that. Generally people on FR understand simple statements like, "The child is innocent." My conclusion was that Stone Mountain is not of sound mind, and therefore a DUer.

Perhaps it is when words and statements contradict each other.
Saying "The child is innocent" after calling that child a bastard,which is in todays vernacular attributed to be an insult or slur,might be the reason for a little confusion.

Just a guess though.

[Stone Mountain]

My conclusion was that Stone Mountain is not of sound mind, and therefore a DUer.

Once again, when your arguments are intellectually bankrupt, you resort to this DU accusation. How sad.